Mass email sent to all MPs in pseudo CANADA and the BCM ...thanks to d & d for the great question and answer...also posted on the bluecollarmovement.blogspot.ca blog...
Subject: Re: re there is no queen of canada
Question: What does “Queen”, “The Queen in the right if Canada”, “Her majesty the Queen”, etc really signify? I know I did not do anything to the “Queen” so who is taking me to court???
Answer:
What it really signifies is the fraud perpetrated against us all. There is no simple answer to your question. But if they cannot prove beyond
doubt, the existence of lawful authority held by the foreign Queen, then they have prosecuted you out of malice. BTW all former Colonies
of Britain are in exactly the same boat as we. People in Australia have attempted to get confirmation from the Queen that she delegated
her sovereign power to the government of Australia and were informed that it has never happened. Same as here.
Here is an attempt to explain.
Do you recall my mention of the 3 "City States"?
We all pay taxes to the "CROWN", which relates to "The City", one square mile in the centre of the city of London(google it), that is NOT a part of England. This is where the Central Bank of England, the World Bank & the IMF are Headquartered. 93% of all revenue collected
by the corporation Canada goes directly to the IMF to pay interest on the fraudulent debt created by borrowing legal tender from it.
Other than the maintenance of the existing global slave ring, there is no valid & logical reason for Canada to have to borrow legal tender at all, unless Canada is not a true Federal Government. And all the evidence shows that its not. All of this gets really deep into the rabbit hole and is part of the reason my Presentations were a minimum of 3 hours long. There is no easy way to learn all of it. I have already forgotten more factual truths about all this than the majority of the population would ever know in their life times. Remember, it took me just over 8 years to accumulate enough evidence to prove their corporate status and that was when I was totally involved and still conducting research daily throughout that entire time. 10,000 needles hidden in 100,000 haystacks.
Anything they do must be founded in some form of "legal" instrument that has clear application and jurisdiction in all of the "provinces", and if its not written on paper, then it simply does not exist in their paper realm. As part of your Right to Due Process and to make answer in defence, you must force the issue discussed in the email exchange I had with the Justice Canada, which finally resulted in their admission that "legally" (based on whats written in their papers) Canada is not comprised of any geographical areas called "provinces" that have names such as: "British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan,..." etcetera. This was established by their response to my request to direct me to a legislative instrument defining "Canada" as including all of the commonly known "provinces". They admitted: "There does not appear to be such a thing." It doesn't matter how absurd or ridiculous that may sound to anyone, it remains as being an irrefutable "legal" fact.
By that response, they also confirmed my proper usage of the term "includes" when interpreting the various "Statutes/Acts". Neither do the "Feds" have a "legal" definition for the term "Province", confirming that "legally" those entities are also, not "a part of Canada" and this is the reason why all dealings between the two corporations must be done through either "Contract" (like rental of the RCMP) or "Memorandum of Understanding" (another form of Contract). Otherwise, in all "Federal" and/or "Provincial", copyright protected, private, corporate documents called "Statutes/Acts", the term "province" only relates to the 3 Territories. I would serve the "CROWN" a "Request for Disclosure" asking them to prove that "legally", you are an inhabitant of a geographical area included in any "legal" definitions identifying the geographical boundaries of "Canada"(which don't exist), so to make you subject to the "Canada's Income Tax Act" and the current "legal action". If they fail to do so, then ask them how their action against you is NOT a blatant violation of everyone's Human Rights. Also, remember to avoid like the plague, any attempt by them to draw you into discussing "subject matter" relative to their "charges", they cannot force you to do anything at all, until they have proven beyond doubt, their "legal" and "lawful" jurisdiction over the geographical areas commonly called "provinces"
and its inhabitants, such as the area of which, you are an inhabitant. Do you know what a "Legal Maxim" is? Look it up. Then rely on this one: "Jurisdiction once challenged must be proved." Also, do NOT use the term "resident", "occupant", or "citizen" in any document when relating to yourself. res-ident is a "thing that sits" much like res-idue is some thing left sitting on some other thing a "citizen" is defined
by legal dictionaries as: "One who owes allegiance to the State and is guaranteed certain rights." Aside from the fact that you don't have
a piece of paper identifying you as a "Canadian citizen" (only immigrants who have written the "Citizenship Exam" have such a document)
always identify yourself as a "man" in possession of "Human" Rights, not just "certain rights". Those "certain rights" also restrict you to
access of only the ones enumerated in their bogus United Kingdom Charter of Rights and Freedoms that they call the "Canadian Charter",
and which, excludes everyone's 3rd Natural Right to "one's own property". As soon as you lose your Right to property, you have also
lost your Right to Freedom, simply because you are not "free" to "own property". So the only Natural Right you have left is to "life" and
only as one of their slaves. Slaves are not allowed to "own property" of any kind and to only receive adequate levels of food, shelter and clothing, so to allow them to subsist and continue working the master's plantation. Sound familiar?
The reason behind my stating all this and your need to be tutored, is because "Law" IS "The masterful use of the language." They have deceived the population with our own language. Including their own lawyers and judges. It is so important that you gain and maintain the mindset that they do NOT have any "legal" or "lawful" jurisdiction over you or your property (income/wages/skills/labour etc). Its the only way you will overcome any deep seated fears you may be harbouring. If you are in fear, then much of what you do will be a "reaction" (knee jerk) rather than a thought out "response". If they try to say you conceded their jurisdiction by your involvement in their GST/HST, Prov Sales Tax, or any other of their alleged requirements of any of their schemes (including what they call "benefits") that most businesses are FORCED to perform as "unpaid tax collectors under threat of punishment", you tell them just that, that you were forced by threat of punishment to perform the "Forced Labour" or any other action they demanded, that you did nothing for them on a "voluntary basis". All of which, constitutes Human Rights violations against you. Also, everyone has the Human Right "to live in a lawful system of social order", not merely a "legal" one. If they can't prove the "lawfulness" of their system, then they have no jurisdiction over anyone but themselves. Which just happens
to be the case anyways.
Also, according to "Maxwell's Interpretation of Statutes" (recognized legal authority) "Any statute that imposes a pecuniary burden on the
subject must be written in clear and unambiguous language." This means that any taxing Statute must be easy to understand by those who
are being made "subject" to it. I have transcripts from Finance Committee Hearings where they admit that even the MP's who passed the Income Tax Act and Amendments to it, do NOT understand the Act and indeed, neither do many of the accounting professionals dealing with it daily. So, if they are not able to understand it, how then is the average individual supposed to? Their "laws" at very best, are ambiguous. Mainly because they can be legitimately read to have completely different meaning and application, if they can be understood, at all. There are just too many cloudy and grey areas. Things like the CRA Act identifying "internal taxes, including income taxes" If "income tax" is an "internal tax", then how does it apply in geographical areas that "legally" are not even "a part of Canada"? That is just one of the dozens of examples of the ambiguity.
In relation to Human Rights, if they show any ignorance in this regard, ask them how then, are they complying with them the "Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms". Further, the Canada has a duty as a Charter Member of the United Nations, to disseminate and provide
training in relation to all such Human Rights, to everyone involved in the Administration of Justice. So, if they are ignorant of the content or
even the existence of any of these international Human Rights laws, then "Canada" is guilty of persistent violations of the Charter of the UN
and is subject to expulsion. Ask them if they want to be the one's responsible for that.
Wish I was healthy so I could come there and stand in defence of Human Rights in your case and on your behalf. I have a tendency to
cause many cranial muscles to be pulled in their tiny brains along with the ability to kick them when they're down. Judges don't like it
much when an individual off the street walks in and starts pointing their finger at him while accusing him of Human Rights violations.
But there is nothing he can do about it. Any threat of removal by a Sheriff is also a Human Rights violation.
db
No comments:
Post a Comment