Re The Charter and some history

Re the Charter.....Trudeau was not our friend.....Diefenbaker was..he was trying to give the provinces back their exclusive power...Look who the CHARTER applies to ( copied below ).....if you look up on the internet, you will see they removed the highlighted section but in the original version, this is how it reads.....The "notwithstanding clause " [ nws = in spite of ] allows a government to open the Charter and make amendments to the Charter and the "exclusion" of non...government employees from Charter rights is one such clause that needs to be amended...I remember Paul Martin when he was PM...near begging Harper NOT to use the NWS clause.... Liberals have fucking ruined this nation and Chretien is among the worst along with Trudeau and off course Mulroney is not but a !!!!.... He forced the gst/hst through by stacking the senate and the blending of the taxes is against the law..Alan J Mac Eachern was livid...as senate leader of the day...we will be raising a constitutional challenge in xxxxx xxxxxs rape and pillage....
all judges take an oath to the queen and if you study the history...in 1893 Revisions Act , section 2 of the BNA was repealed which was the heirs and successors of the monarch...in other words with the death of Queen Victoria [ Victoria Day ] no law was in place giving the Monarch and jurisdiction in the colonies...and was further affirmed in 1931 Statute of Westminster....all colonies were released from the British Crown to be sovereign with in their spheres...or free with in their boundaries and were to federate at a later date....it was never successfuly done as quebec never signed on....this was also an issue in 1867....and that is why they play the separatist card and why the Fed caters so...Quebec knows the truth...and they will not be fucked.....However...a federal leader from quebec is very bad for the rest of us because they operate under "french civil code " which is power down while the remainder of the nation is supposed to be under British common law type f government..ie" power in the people....and delegated to the elected.
When you really get into it, you will find that CANADA is a CORPORATION regis tered in Washington and "includes" the Yukon, the NW Territories and Nunavut  and control over the reserves...and the waters surrounding the continent BUT not the rest of the provinces...
As far as it being a great country.....I agree...however...talk to any small business owner ( the real tax collectors unpaid ] and you will hear horror stories that will curl your hair....these cocksuckers are (cra ) a collection agency for the IMF...Federal Reserve/ world bank of which Bank of CANADA is the 13 th federal reserve....
What I write is truth and as a result of 10 years of hard study...we can not afford the insane malicious tactics being used against the small business owner...labour is the true currency and we are not allowed the fruits of our own labour...
Typical of the bull shit is the "high cost of education" the teachers make 50 to 104 grand per year and in this province were told to cut 4 % from their budgets which is 6 million dollars....They are crying like the socialist sloth they are....they need no tools or equipment to do what they do other than the immersion into the communist universities...and ultimately "all things in the hands of the state"
As I said in a previous email...there are two sets of rules for two different classes...the middle class is the administrative class and the merchants and their employees are in fact the third class...Read the Hindu Holy Book called the Bagavahad Gita for confirmation.....

The Bhagavad Gita (pronounced: [ˈbʱəɡəʋəd̪ ɡiːˈt̪aː] ( listen)), also referred to as Gita, is a 700-verse Hindu scripture that is part of the ancient Sanskrit epic Mahabharata. Due to its presence in the epic, it is classified as a Smṛiti text.

You will note that PM Harper is not very excited about this Charter and made comments that Diefinbaker was the originator ( Canadian Bill of Right 1960 )of this BUT Trudeau made it a Liberal secular rag and pretty much wrote Dief off......as well as the working labour class...

Section 32 Charter

Canadian Heritage
pch.gc.ca
Common menu bar links
Français
Home
Contact Us
Help
Search
canada.gc.ca
BreadcrumbHome >  Human Rights Program >  Section 32-33 : Application of Charter
Share
Section 32-33 : Application of Charter

Section 32
Section 33
Section 32

Application of Charter

This Charter applies
to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matter within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and
to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.
Notwithstanding subsection (1), section 15 shall not have effect until three years after this section comes into force.
The purpose of this section is to make it clear that the Charter only applies to governments, and not to private individuals, businesses or other organizations.

As mentioned earlier, section 32(2) was necessary in order to give governments a chance to amend their laws to bring them into line with the right to equality. Section 15 of the Charter did not come into force until three years after the rest of the Charter became effective on April 17,1982.

Section 33

Parliament or the legislature of a province may expressly declare in an Act of Parliament or of the legislature, as the case may be, that the Act or a provision thereof shall operate notwithstanding a provision included in section 2 or sections 7 to 15 of this Charter.
An Act or a provision of an Act in respect of which a declaration made under this section is in effect shall have such operation as it would have but for the provision of this Charter referred to in the declaration.
A declaration made under subsection (1) shall cease to have effect five years after it comes into force or on such earlier date as may be specified in the declaration.
Parliament or a legislature of a province may re-enact a declaration made under subsection (1).
Subsection (3) applies in respect of a re-enactment made under subsection (4).
Both Parliament and provincial legislatures have a limited power under section 33 to pass laws that are exempt from certain Charter provisions – those concerning fundamental freedoms and legal and equality rights. This section is sometimes referred to as the "notwithstanding clause".

In order to rely on this section, Parliament or a legislature must state specifically that a particular law is exempt from the Charter. It must also state which sections of the Charter do not apply. An exemption from the Charter lasts a maximum of five years. After that, if Parliament or the legislature concerned wishes it to continue to be exempt from the Charter, it must make a new declaration under this section.

The purpose of this section is to require a government that wishes to limit Charter rights to say clearly what it is doing and accept the political consequences of it.

It also ensures that Parliament and the legislatures, not the courts, have the final say on important matters of public policy. If, at a certain point, the rights in the Charter no longer reflect Canadian values, then democratically elected bodies like Parliament and the legislatures can make laws that are not bound by the Charter.

To date, provincial legislatures have used this section rarely. It has never been used by the federal Parliament.

Back to Index