To: CBC- Go Public <gopublic@cbc.ca>

Good Day,

I was formerly involved in the field of Human Rights for over twenty years, as result, I collected massive amounts of documented evidence that is absolutely shocking and for many, completely unbelievable. Please be advised, the facts reported to the Minister of National Revenue/ M.P. Gail Shea, are based upon evidence, not belief, opinion, or theory. Many lawyers and prosecutors have confirmed my understanding of the so-called "law", to be greater than their own. Perhaps someone in your own legal department is capable of doing what no one in any "government" has yet been able to do, namely, disprove the facts reported below. Please believe me, I tried to myself and could not.
The email copied and pasted below, was in response to her 2 page letter sent to me.

In the past, CBC has shown its willingness to expose various elements of fraud and/or scandals arising from the conduct of certain members of the so-called "government", so, is it willing to expose the evidence backed facts I have reported to Gail Shea on June 3, 2012?  I hope so, as my life may depend on it. This is not about "tax protesters" or "anti-government" or any other such label, as previously applied by the media, it is about the Great Deception, as referred in scriptures. When reading the email below, please realize that your children will be subject to this system one day and you may not be here to help them.    BTW, I have already proven most of this through unchallenged evidence filed in B.C. Supreme Court.  I hope to soon hear back from you.  
Copied and pasted email sent to Gail Shea, follows:



To: Gail Shea, natural woman and "P.C. M.P.,"  and for provision to all other men and women necessarily involved in the instant matter:
Notice to the Agent is Notice to the Principal and Notice to the Principal is Notice to the Agent.
Reference: Canada Revenue Agency's threat of creating extreme hardship for and risk of death to me, through unlawful garnishment

Preamble:
Prior to your reading this letter of response, kindly read the United Nation's "Convention on the Rights of Disabled Persons", Ratified by "Canada" on March 10, 2010, the purpose of which is: "to promote, protect and ensure the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disabilities, and to promote respect for their inherent dignity.” and; the "International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights", Ratified by "Canada" in August, 1976.  You may also want to peruse the "Optional Protocol" to that Covenant. You should also read the "Charter of the United Nations" and in particular, the section relating to: "A Member of the United Nations which has persistently violated the Principles contained in the present Charter..." and the resulting possibility of the expulsion of a "Member State" from the United Nations, for those persistent violations confirmed by the valid evidence I possess.

Also, kindly refer to the copies you must have, of all medical reports, or of their general content, as furnished by my former doctor to the "Province of British Columbia Ministry of Housing and Social Development" (or whatever they're calling themselves this week) in relation to the multiple disabilities I suffer daily and which, were required for qualification to receive "Provincial disability assistance". If you are not aware of all the disabilities from which I suffer and the fact that I am and have officially been a recipient of that "disability assistance" since 2009, then kindly advise how you expect to ascertain or achieve any level of understanding or assessment of the medical conditions and diseases from which I suffer, my resulting financial situation and the hardships I am already experiencing. By your requirement for me to complete the "Income and Expense/Net Worth Statement" accompanying your letter, it would appear you are without knowledge and operating blindly and completely separate from the entity on whose behalf you also operate, through the illegal delegation of power evidenced by various "Collection Agreements", in the collection of the "internal taxes" known as "Provincial Income Taxes". It should also be noted that I have been ill since at least mid 1999, as evidenced by "Motions" and my doctor's letter filed in Provincial Court of B.C., in or around 1999 - 2000 and yet, I had avoided becoming reliant on any "government assistance" throughout that entire ten year period by my own choice and the kindness of friends who had provided accommodations and gratuitous meals, until I felt I was overstaying their generous welcomes. I am not a "welfare bum", a term too often used when referring to and discriminating against such recipients. I would much rather be healthy and fully capable of supporting my own life, than to rely and become a dependent of any Human Rights violating "government", this in spite of the fact I have remained subject to more than 160 different forms of taxation every day of my 62 years of life in this form of slavery and servitude.

Response:
I have received your letter of response, date stamped as May 18  2012, autographed by you in your capacity of "Member of Parliament"
and not as the "Minister of National Revenue", notwithstanding the letterhead of the document. Is this because the "Minister of National Revenue" has been without a "Ministry" since 1999, with the creation of the "Canada Customs and Revenue Agency" Corporation? Notwithstanding any response you may provide, I write to you now in all of your capacities, including and most importantly, as the naturally created woman who from time to time, rents out her brain to the "legal fictions/artificial persons" called "Member of Parliament" and/or "Minister of National Revenue".

Thank you for your expression of concern for "the difficulties" I am "experiencing". Yes, I guess one could classify "dying", as being one of the greatest "difficulties" one is likely to encounter in "life", although it has become apparent that carrying on effective and productive communications with Officers of your C.R.A., is a close runner-up. Especially since they are the only ones appearing as vultures wanting to feed off any remains of an individual's entire existence. Is the following Article part of the reason why you have defended their "intentions"?  
http://m.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/ndp-demands-canada-wide-probe-of-alleged-corruption-at-tax-agency/article2225683/?service=mobile
 
Aside from your provision of four different addresses, three of which are in foreign "Provincial" jurisdictions (not "provincial" jurisdictions)
and to which, you have directed me to respond, or to forward completed documents, you also provided a contact phone number for
Ms. Parminder Bains, at the Surrey, British Columbia business address. My attempt to contact her at that number brought the same result as achieved every time I have phoned any number at the C.R.A., including that of Mr. Youssef El-Masri, that result being, leaving a message on their "voice mail". I have not been able to make one, single, successful telephone call to any living and relevant human individual at the C.R.A., ever!  As result, I am compelled to believe that none of them ever actually answer their telephones, as a form of "call screening", allowing them to pick and choose those with whom they would find it financially favourable to communicate. I hope my belief is incorrect, as such conduct would not give the appearance of their having intention to perform their duties in a professional manner, in spite of the appearance they operate on some form of "quota and commission" pay scale.

Please be advised, for my own security of person (as a human person), I prefer to conduct any communication with your "government" or
its agencies in writing, not by telephone, as I do not have the legal tender of all others at my disposal, to allow me to buy/own recording equipment, as employed by the C.R.A..  I find the "playing field" under such conditions to be more of a "slippery slope". Also, with the severe short term memory loss I now experience as a side-effect of one or more of the three disabilities from which I suffer daily, it is impossible for me to recall what was said and in some cases, that a conversation even took place. The short term memory loss only affects my recall of recent events, not all that happened or all that I knew prior to its onset. Further, I do not have a printer, or access to one, therefore, writing the letters you have directed me to write to certain of the four different C.R.A. Officers named in your letter, would require hand written letters, which would create great difficulties for me in relation to making any necessary corrections or insertions into previously written text of the hand written letter/correspondence, also creating insufferable degrees of stress and further negative effects on my immune system. Such archaic methods are not only technologically unnecessary, but potentially very costly for all "taxpayers" ("legal fiction/artificial person" terminology your people use to identify the source of their income), as not everyone's hand writing is legible and leaves room for misunderstandings resultant from the Officer's misreading of its text, especially in light of fact that English is a second language to many of them, and in any case, could only lead to further costs in achieving resolve of the matter.

The majority of the business world relies on new, modern technologies such as "email", in carrying on their daily business. Why does the C.R.A. not use this most convenient and most expedient method of communication? They should at least provide a direct email address to allow ongoing communications with the individual they've identified as "taxpayer" and who has become the target of their attention, just as I provided mine to the robot operating on behalf of Ms. Parminder Bains. In corresponding with any of the many types of businesses operating, I am hard pressed to think of one that presents a greater requirement for communications to be in writing, than those exchanged with the C.R.A., notwithstanding the "intention of CRA officials to be" anything "other than professional". I must assume your statement made in this regard, relates to the three recently charged "former CRA officials" who had operated in the criminal world of bribery and kick-backs while employed by the C.R.A.. I must also assume that the fear and intimidation tactics employed by certain "CRA officials" on numerous individuals also labelled as "taxpayers" (or should I say "non-taxpayers") which resulted in their committing suicide (I am aware of at least 12), were not to be included in your generalized statement relating to their having nothing other than "professional" "intention(s)". If email addresses are available for any of those you identified in your letter, then kindly provide or have them provide those email addresses to me. This is also necessary because of the difference in time zones between jurisdictions and the restricted/limited windows of opportunity available to contact even their robot machines during normal business hours. Not to forget the fact that I experience extreme difficulty in sleeping at night, due to my inability to produce the hormone melatonin and have to take supplements. As well, all the other symptoms of malnutrition I experience daily and the muscle seizures experienced when my body becomes horizontal, along with my recognition of the fact that sleeping does nothing to allow me to feel rested upon waking, but rather, to feel just as exhausted as I did the entire day before and the entire day before that. Therefore, I am rarely up and cleared of the melatonin induced brain fog before at least noon my time. The only thing I can predict in or about my life these days, is that it will remain less than worth living until the day I actually do die. You and yours appear promoting of that event.        
"The Colour of Law":
Notwithstanding the "de facto" ("not founded on law" - Barron's Canadian Law Dictionary) status of "Canada's" "Head of State" while giving "Royal Assent" to any Bill that has been passed through Parliament and thereby appearing to make it "law", throughout your letter you have identified your reliance on what is written in and allowed by, what must therefore be called, "de facto legislation" and also, what is not written or not allowed by that type of "legislation". You have thereby made clear, that any "legal action" taken, or proposed to be taken by C.R.A. officials, must appear to be "legally" supported and/or allowed by what is written in "legislation" passed by the Parliament of Canada. I fully understand the "legal" necessity of having everything written so to, in fact, make it "legal" and so everything that is done by the C.R.A., or its officials, can be substantiated, or at least appear as being "legally" valid and to prevent their taking any "illegal" actions against one of their targeted "taxpayers". I am also aware that just because an action is identified as a "legal action", it does not necessarily mean it is a "lawful action". In light of all the above, I am compelled to advise you that I am in possession of written confirmation from the "Legislative Services Branch" of your "Justice Canada", that there is not a single piece of "legislation", nor any written "legal" definition existing anywhere, that  identifies "Canada" as being "legally" comprised of any geographical area commonly called a "province" (please note use of lower-case "p") that would have a name such as: "British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan,..." and so forth. There is nothing that is written anywhere to "legally" confirm otherwise and I hold you to the strict proof of the contrary. Therefore, and since you admit to being a staunch supporter and follower of what is "written" in various legal instruments, I must also ask that you to direct me to the "legislation", "de facto" or "de jure", that would allow the "Canada Revenue Agency" to take any form of "legal" action that would also be "lawful", against any inhabitant of any geographical area that "legally", is not "a part of Canada". Reciprocal Agreements entered into with the City State, the District of Columbia, are not relevant to the instant matter.

I am also compelled to advise that I am aware of the different contexts created by the capitalization of the first letter of any generic geographical term, such as "city, town, state, province", as expressed in the Translation Bureau's publication: "Canadian Style
A Guide to Writing and Editing". Just as I am aware of the change of context resultant from the writing of an alleged "name" of a human person entirely in upper-case lettering, not only making it a non-English "word", but also destroying any ability to identify it as being a "proper noun", "the name of a person, place or thing", and of which, only the first letter is capitalized, not to overlook the fact that such a composition of upper-case letters is a contravention of the "Official Languages Act", by showing total disrespect for the Rules of Grammar of English. In fact, every document created by any "government" contains similar texts written entirely in upper-case lettering, which is not provided for or allowed by those Rules of Grammar of English. My understanding that such compositions of upper-case characters of the English alphabet is only allowed to be used in "Department of National Defence documents" to identify "the specific part of an exercise name", "e.g. Exercise SILENT DEFENDER" and in Admiralty Law, to the names of ships and various other sea going vessels.  

I am also aware that the "government of Canada" has not created a written "legal" definition of the term "Province", as have all "Provincial Legislatures" in their respective "Interpretation Act(s)", while "Canada's" "Interpretation Act", or any other of its "Acts", only provide a written "legal" definition of the term "province", and it does not "include" any geographical area that is commonly called and referred to on the street, as being a "province", as those named above, but rather, it only "includes" the 3 Territories. I am also aware of the proper usage of the term
"includes", as confirmed by the recognized language authority Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage. I am also aware of the two "legal maxims" (a "maxim" is "a set of facts that need no proof", i.e. "step off that cliff and you'll fall to the bottom" - similar to a mathematical axiom, the sum of two equal numbers will always be equal) relative to usage of the term "includes", which are: "the inclusion of one is the exclusion of another" and "the expression of one is the exclusion of another". All of which confirm that when using the term "includes", all of the components that are intended to be seen as being included, must be either written or expressed immediately following the use of that term. I am also aware of two "Supreme Court of Canada" rulings confirming the above proper usage of "includes". I am also aware that there is no such thing as "the government of the province of British Columbia", or "of the province of Alberta", or any other geographical area commonly called a "province" by people on the street. Rather, there are only "governments of the Province of...", all identified "in the corporate sense" by the capitalization of the first letter "P".

I am also aware that all existing "legislation" is under "copyright protection", the purpose of which is only to: "the protection of a private opinion or idea". This in itself poses a serious question as to their being "public laws", and not just "private corporate policies", as a company (a "legal fiction/artificial person"), like "Wal-Mart" might rely upon. Further, if they were true "public laws", Assented to by someone in possession of lawful authority to make them "laws", then they would belong to us all and could not qualify or be subject to copyright protection. It would also allow individuals to acquire the "Official Version(s)" without having to pay again in order to get it and thereby remove those financial restrictions, resulting in reduced numbers of people who would live in "ignorance of the law". I am also aware that the entire operation of the current system is totally reliant on the population remaining in that ignorance in order to financially sustain the fictional entities the system has created. Those being the "legal fictions/artificial persons", such as the ones that you, from time to time, pretend to be, by acting in their capacities. The fact that you are merely "acting" confirms that you, the natural woman, have no authority over anyone, only the "legal fiction/artificial person" has what must then be, "fictional" or "artificial" authority, as assigned it by the respective de facto legislation, or otherwise, "artificial law". This is supported by fact that one cannot do physical harm to the "State", as it is merely a "fiction", an "artificial person" that is not capable of feeling or thinking anything and has no life or real property that could be subject to threat.    

Along with all of the foregoing, there is also the issue of each and every "government" being Registered as a "Company" in both the United States Security and Exchange Commission, where "Canada" shows its "Business Address" as "Washington, D.C.", and also in Dunn & Bradstreet, where all "Provincial Ministries" are identified with a phrase to the effect: "BRITISH COLUMBIA PROVINCE OF also traded as..." and followed by the name of the particular "Ministry". These Registrations provide clear indication that there are no true and lawfully constituted "governments de jure" operating in any geographical area that is believed to be "a part of Canada", but rather and only,
out-for-profit, pure corporations. Further, and in light of "Canada's" "Business Address", it appears possible that it is a direct subsidiary corporation of the "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION". Heaven only knows, or should I say Hell only knows, the actual implications of this fact. After all, having a "Business Address" within a known "City State", a totally autonomous entity that is not a part of any country, certainly disables ones ability to recognize "the government of Canada" as being a valid and lawfully constituted true government, of any kind, or at all. Perhaps this also provides reason for the de facto status held by the one acting in capacity of "Canada's Head of State".

As a result of all of the above facts, established and confirmed by many of your "government's" own legal instruments, it is necessary for you  to provide copies of or direction to, valid and lawful, written evidence to the contrary, including any true "public laws" Assented to by one in
de jure possession of the sovereign power. This is necessary to remove any potential for my reliance on Section 15 of the Criminal Code of Canada, entitled: "Obedience to de facto law".

I am also aware of the Legal Maxim: "Jurisdiction once challenged must be proved". This letter of response is intended to challenge your jurisdiction and that of your "government" and to provide you the opportunity to establish as fact, that you, in any of your official capacities, or any Agent acting on behalf of, or "in the service of" "the government of Canada", is in possession of the necessary de jure authority to make any kind of demand on any individual who is not "in the service of the government of Canada" or of a "Province" and has not knowingly waived their Human Rights and entered into any form of "master/servant employment relationship" with either such "government". Only the provision of this valid evidence will free you and others involved from liability for the Human Rights violations committed against all natural men and women forced to deal with demands placed on them by your "government" and any of it's Agents. This liability exists in spite of any "official capacity" claimed at the time of the alleged violations. You are hereby Noticed of this challenge and opportunity for disclosure.

I am confident in your ability to comprehend what I have reported here, as your knowledge and understanding of the "Income Tax Act" comprised of more than 1400 pages of extremely ambiguous language (contrary to "Maxwell's Interpretation of Statutes"), plus 483 pages of Income Tax Application Rules and Regulations and 35 remission orders, must surely speak to your competence in easily comprehending written materials. No "Interpretation" section is necessary to the comprehension of matters involved in this letter, as I have written and re-written it over a five day period, in the plainest form of English possible, considering the subject matter to which it relates and the conditions from which, I suffer every moment.

I await your only appropriate response and provision of the above identified valid documents necessary to establish your lawful authority and jurisdiction over me, a natural man, who is not "in the service of" any "government", de facto or de jure and who knows and exercises all Natural and Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

Further Notice:
I have notified my friends and relatives that in the event of my death, they should do whatever is necessary to ascertain the reason for my death, not just the cause, and if it is determined in any way related to any action(s) taken by any individual while "in the service of the government of Canada" or of any other "government", they should file a lawsuit for "Wrongful Death", against the individuals named in this and other correspondence relative to the instant matter, in their private capacities as men and woman and not as the "legal fictions/artificial persons" that they, from time to time, pretend to be. As a "legal fiction/artificial person" is not capable of violating anything or causing anyone's death and only a man or woman could be answer-able for such conduct and its results.

                                                                                                                            Giving respect where due,
                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                            David Butterfield, natural man, and;
                                                                                                                            Defender of all Human Rights.

The purpose of a Constitution....and to whom does the Charter of Rights apply.....astounding deception

This post was originally sent as an email to recipients below....

All MP's
      all BCM Members
      others


The purpose of a Constitution is as a set of rules which those elected or appointed or hired must abide by. This document which now includes the Charter of Rights and Freedoms comprise the Constitution Act 1982.......section 32 of the Charter fully affirms that the Charter is only applicable to Governments...see below...Many pseudo cops and acting special constables must take an oath to the Queen ( who has been impotent since 1901 ) Many are required to renew every two years and MUST have surety and bonds in place to hold the Government harmless in the event they step over and cause injury for want of jurisdiction.

If any action is taken against you, focus primarily on THEIR jurisdiction over you...and if you are note employees of the various Governments, OR preforming a function of Government where by you are being compensated, then their acts and statutes only apply to them.

In the real Law...Law one states: 1. I am the Lord your God; you shall not have strange gods before Me.  ( queenie and pope are really strange gods) The rest of the Law is available in the Law book   in the Book of Exodus, Chapter 20, Verses 1 to 17.
Acts and statutes are rues and regulations that apply to those preforming a function of Government.....and being compensated...
Usury is also condemned in Law so Jim Flarety....please take heed....

Charter per sec 32 only applies to  governments...see for your self.....this info is delefed on most internet versions.....



Canadian Heritage
pch.gc.ca
Common menu bar links
Français
Home
Contact Us
Help
Search
canada.gc.ca
BreadcrumbHome >  Human Rights Program >  Section 32-33 : Application of Charter
Share
Section 32-33 : Application of Charter

Section 32
Section 33
Section 32

Application of Charter

This Charter applies
to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matter within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and
to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.
Notwithstanding subsection (1), section 15 shall not have effect until three years after this section comes into force.

The purpose of this section is to make it clear that the Charter only applies to governments, and not to private individuals, businesses or other organizations.

As mentioned earlier, section 32(2) was necessary in order to give governments a chance to amend their laws to bring them into line with the right to equality. Section 15 of the Charter did not come into force until three years after the rest of the Charter became effective on April 17,1982.

David Icke " Ironically, the "power" that the controllers have is an absolute and total illusion"

THERE IS NO WORLD CONSPIRACY?
By David Icke

People who believe that there is no major world conspiracy which involves a small number of people manipulating humanity through a hierarchical structure of control toward a New World Order, all have one identical factor in common.

They have, in actual fact, not looked genuinely into the abundance of well-researched information on world conspiracy to see if there is one!

Many of those "non-believers" may well say: "It's just not possible, far too complex a plan for the world's population to become manipulated and controlled without everyone knowing about it."

Others may say: "It's just not possible that so few, immoral and unbalanced people can be in total control of our world society."

Others may just be in denial, because to realise such a fact would immediately crush the false security of their belief system, financial investments or employment situation, etc.

It may be that others are simply too afraid to allow this fearsome truth into their reality.

Whatever the reason, none have genuinely looked. They have not looked with an open mind, an open heart and with the honest intention of finding out the absolute truth.

With this powerfully focused attitude, anyone can find out, undoubtedly, whether or not there is a major world conspiracy.....

or even discover the answers to the Universe!!

See the truth and the truth shall set you free.

MANIPULATION AND CONTROL

Contrary to common understanding, most human beings (unless we are extremely enlightened) have desires consciously or unconsciously to manipulate others to some degree or other. However, very few people are immune to this conditioning.

It is important, therefore, when pointing the finger at the major manipulators and controllers of our planet, for us to be as fully aware as possible of the depth of the motivation behind our own desires.

Truly desiring to be totally free, for ourselves, as well as for all of humanity makes for an immensely powerful and focused energy toward exposing the major controllers so that every human being will become free. Free at last.

THE MAJOR CONTROLLERS

The Elite World Government, controllers of our society, have (in certain aspects,) great intelligence - but they have no wisdom.

Intelligence without wisdom can be a very dangerous mindset, and they are the epitome of this fact.

It quickly becomes obvious to those who personally research into the hierarchical structure of world conspiracy, that the major manipulators and controllers of humanity are the ones with the largest accumulation of wealth, the owners of the banks and multinational oil, pharmaceutical and food corporations etc. These are the people who run the world.

Not surprising really, is it?

These same people own and dominate the military, police and intelligence hierarchy and, of course, all the political pawns that society has been brainwashed into believing are the most powerful people in the world.

They have also systematically created - and they orchestrate - the brainwashing structures of the media, education and dogmatic mainstream religion to imprison our minds within the logical, reasoning, left hemisphere of our brain.

These structured systems have been covertly designed to cut us off, as much as possible, from activating the intuitive, creative, right hemisphere of our brain, which is connected to our "heart mind" and therefore to all the knowledge that exists.

Once the individual has accepted the reality of this world power structure, they have just taken the first step toward freedom for themselves and for all of humanity.



Fig 1: The Elite Government system seeks to imprison the human psyche in the left brain, the "rational" intellect which only believes what it can see, touch, hear or smell. The education system and the media are structured for this and most teachers, lecturers, scientists and journalists are left brain prisoners themselves. Fig 2: When we open our hearts and minds we actviate the right brain, the intuition and insparation that connects with the cosmos.
The left brain prisoner is a minipulators dream. They have YOUR power in THEIR hands The equally balanced right and left brain person is a manipulators nightmare because.... YOU ARE IN YOUR OWN POWER!!
REPTILIAN MENTALITY

It is very important to understand the "mental attitude" of the individuals who are within the apex of the hierarchical pyramid structure of control over the human race. Being totally devoid of any humanitarian qualities, they are immensely different to the average person, and basically do not think in any way similar to us.

They think and act from the reptilian (ancient and animalistic) part of their brains.

It has been documented by science that the reptilian part of the human brain - known as the "R Complex" - is the source of the following behavioural traits:

An obsession with ritual; cold-blooded behaviour; territorialism ("This belongs to me" mentality); obsession with "top-down" hierarchical structures.

The more that this "R Complex" is activated in the individual, the more these negative traits will be manifested more profoundly.

It is also important to understand that they do not "feel" in any way similar to the average person either.

Many people are guided by their emotional feelings, which can manifest positive behaviour such as moral judgement, compassion, empathy, and kindness towards others.

Within the "R Complex" mentality there are no such emotions, therefore qualities such as moral judgement, compassion, empathy and kindness towards others are non-existent.

Another important factor, is that the highly activated "R Complex" person has no deep concept of "self".

Because of this lack of inner knowledge of "who they really are", their motivations are directly based in fear. This very deep subconscious fear of not being truly in control of themselves, manifests with the powerful desire to control others, by using fear as their weapon.

This is the "R Complex" mentality.

This is the mentality of the individuals within the Elite World Government hierarchy, who covertly dominate, manipulate and control humanity toward the agenda of their New World Order.

Vibrational Prison



The reptilian mentality have imprisoned so much of human consciousness within the dimensional prison of fear, guilt and frustration. Only by opening our hearts and minds can we escape and reconnect with our infinite self.

Love is the answer.

STEPPING OUT OF THE PYRAMID OF IGNORANCE

The Elite World Government hierarchy control society by blinding us with ignorance and fear through their structured mind-control systems of the media, education and dogmatic religion. They know very well how the human mind works, and they use this knowledge to their advantage.

By keeping the masses of the human race in ignorance and fear we become an absolute cakewalk for domination, manipulation and control. Like taking candy from a baby.

Although, amazingly enough, stepping out of this pyramid of ignorance and fear is so unbelievably simple.



All the major institutions and groups that affect our daily lives connect with the Global Elite, which decides the coordinated policy throughout the pyramid. People in the lower compartments will have no idea what they are part of.

KNOWLEDGE IS POWER

Presently, the greatest majority of people in the world are imprisoned within this structure of ignorance and fear.

They are ignorant of the big picture - of what is really going on, and also, who we really are - our immense capabilities as human beings.

Ironically, the "power" that the controllers have is an absolute and total illusion. They in fact have NO POWER WHATSOEVER.



Their illusionary power exists only because each and every human being who imprison themselves within the pyramid of ignorance, are giving their own power away to the reptilian mentality of the major controllers within the Elite World Government.

We, as individuals and as the human race, can immediately be free of this controlling structure by genuinely looking at and seeing the "big picture" and therefore stepping out of the pyramid that has kept humanity enslaved for such a long time. Many people all over the world are waking up to this fact and are now free, simply by seeing and acknowledging the bigger picture.

Knowledge is power and the power of knowledge can set us free.

THE HUNDREDTH MONKEY SYNDROME

Once enough individuals around our beautiful planet begin to see the big picture, step out of the pyramid of ignorance, take their own power back instead of giving it away directly to the Elite World Government, their controlling pyramid structure will collapse and will be no more.

Humanity will be free, free at last. Free to build a better world, by "giving" - from the immense power of love, instead of "taking" - from the energy of fear.



A. Fear is a long slow wavelength and activates very few of our DNA antenna's which connect us with the cosmos.

B. Love is a short, fast wavelength which activates many more antennas and reconnects us with all that is.

THE POWER OF LOVE

The knowledge that is now amassing within the human race is the understanding that the greatest power in creation is the power of love.

Everything in creation, everything we can see and understand, and everything we cannot, is a manifestation of this immense and wonderful power. Fear is just one of the many manifested energies created from the immense power of love.

It is important to realise that when the energy of fear is deeply understood, it can be used as a powerful catalyst for guiding us as individuals and humanity as a whole, toward love, truth and courage.

Fear is an energy that is implosive, ever-contracting and "self" destructive. It exists within the realms of time, is finite and therefore eventually dies.

Love, on the other hand, is a power that is explosive, ever-expanding and "self" empowering. It exists within the realms of time and timelessness and is therefore infinite. Love can never die.

The time is drawing near, when all of the human race will no longer be within the pyramid of ignorance and fear. We will be back where we belong, in the arms of LOVE, PEACE and FREEDOM.

We can do it. We will do it. It starts with you.

THE POWER OF LOVE IS THE KEY.

BILLS OF EXCHANGE ACT pay your public debts

BILLS OF EXCHANGE ACT ( GOVERNMNET OF CANADA)
According to our constitution , section 92 gives exclusive nontransferable power to direct tax to the provincial government. The federal government can impose an excise tax but cannot impose a direct tax. This is confirmed by the Supreme Court in the Lord Nelson vs.: attorney general of Nova Scotia and attorney general of Canada in 1950.( copies available) No level of government can transfer the powers given to it under the constitution to any other level of government. No level means no level .This being the case, how can the municipal government impose a property tax and take your property if you do not pay? The answer is simple, they do not have the power to do this .How then does the municipality get the funds to pay for the public costs? Through the Bills of Exchange Act.
The way it currently works as you know, you receive the Municipal Tax Bill and tear off the bottom and include your own personal cheque to the amount of the bill. You sign your cheque giving it currency ( it is the signature that gives the cheque currency , not the numbers on it) and then send the tear off along with your personal money in the form of a cheque to pay the public debts. This is the way it currently works but IS this the way it was intended to work? I think not.
In that we are all private individuals and we share a common public domain, it is necessary to have a collective infrastructure and the upkeep of same. This requires capital. The public domain requires public money to pay public debts. Who has the power to create the public money? The collective public through monetizing the TAX BILL .The assessment that is done by the municipality is based on YOUR PRIVATE PROPERTY .You are allowing the public to use your property as the collateral to create the public revenue to pay the public debts.
The tax bill is actually money (as a bill of exchange), like a cheque .It has the numbers on it or at least the location for the numbers. You simply give it value by signing your signature in your normal cheque writing script. It is charged by your signature and becomes a bill of exchange and then can be deposited in the public accounts to pay the public debts.( see bills of exchange sec 57-1 below)
What happens if the powers that be refuse to accept your offer? They are in default and you can liquidate them by calling the CRA and advising them (CRA) that the Municipality is not abiding by the law and an audit may be required.


R.S., c. B-5, s. 57.

Presumption of value57. (1) Every party whose signature appears on a bill is, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, deemed to have become a party thereto for value.

Presumed holder in due course
(2) Every holder of a bill is, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, deemed to be a holder in due course, but if, in an action on a bill, it is admitted or proved that the acceptance, issue or subsequent negotiation of the bill is affected with fraud, duress or force and fear, or illegality, the burden of proof that he is the holder in due course is on him, unless and until he proves that, subsequent to the alleged fraud or illegality, value has in good faith been given for the bill by some other holder in due course.


Dishonour by non-acceptance80. A bill is dishonoured by non-acceptance when
(a) it is duly presented for acceptance and such an acceptance as is prescribed by this Act is refused or cannot be obtained; or
(b) presentment for acceptance is excused and the bill is not accepted.
R.S., c. B-5, s. 81.

Recourse81. Subject to this Act, when a bill is dishonoured by non-acceptance, an immediate right of recourse against the drawer and endorsers accrues to the holder, and no presentment for payment is necessary.
R.S., c. B-5, s. 95.

Notice of Dishonour

Notice of dishonour95. (1) Subject to this Act, when a bill has been dishonoured by non-acceptance or by non-payment, notice of dishonour must be given to the drawer and each endorser, and any drawer or endorser to whom the notice is not given is discharged.

Subsequent holder
(2) Where a bill is dishonoured by non-acceptance and notice of dishonour is not given, the rights of a holder in due course subsequent to the omission are not prejudiced by the omission.

Notice of subsequent dishonour
(3) Where a bill is dishonoured by non-acceptance and due notice of dishonour is given, it is not necessary to give notice of a subsequent dishonour by non-payment, unless the bill is accepted in the meantime.

"DECLARATION OF SENTIMENTS ADOPTED BY PEACE CONVENTION. "Boston, 1838.

"DECLARATION OF SENTIMENTS ADOPTED BY PEACE CONVENTION. "Boston, 1838.



"We the undersigned, regard it as due to ourselves, to the cause which we love, to the country in which we live, to publish a declaration expressive of the purposes we aim to accomplish and the measures we shall adopt to carry forward the work of peaceful universal reformation.

"We do not acknowledge allegiance to any human government. We recognize but one King and Lawgiver, one Judge and Ruler of mankind. Our country is the world, our countrymen are all mankind. We love the land of our nativity only as we love all other lands. The interests and rights of American citizens are not dearer to us than those of the whole human race. Hence we can allow no appeal to patriotism to revenge any national insult or injury...

"We conceive that a nation has no right to defend itself against foreign enemies or to punish its invaders, and no individual possesses that right in his own case, and the unit cannot be of greater importance than the aggregate. If soldiers thronging from abroad with intent to commit rapine and destroy life may not be resisted by the people or the magistracy, then ought no resistance to be offered to domestic troublers of the public peace or of private security.

"The dogma that all the governments of the world are approvingly ordained of God, and that the powers that be in the United States, in Russia, in Turkey, are in accordance with his will, is no less absurd than impious. It makes the impartial Author of our existence unequal and tyrannical. It cannot be affirmed that the powers that be in any nation are actuated by the spirit or guided by the example of Christ in the treatment of enemies; therefore they cannot be agreeable to the will of God, and therefore their overthrow by a spiritual regeneration of their subjects is inevitable.

"We regard as unchristian and unlawful not only all wars, whether offensive or defensive, but all preparations for war; every naval ship, every arsenal, every fortification, we regard as unchristian and unlawful; the existence of any kind of standing army, all military chieftains, all monuments commemorative of victory over a fallen foe, all trophies won in battle, all celebrations in honor of military exploits, all appropriations for defense by arms; we regard as unchristian and unlawful every edict of government requiring of its subjects military service.

"Hence we deem it unlawful to bear arms, and we cannot hold any office which imposes on its incumbent the obligation to compel men to do right on pain of imprisonment or death. We therefore voluntarily exclude ourselves from every legislative and judicial body, and repudiate all human politics, worldly honors, and stations of authority. If we cannot occupy a seat in the legislature or on the bench, neither can we elect others to act as our substitutes in any such capacity. It follows that we cannot sue any man at law to force him to return anything he may have wrongly taken from us; if he has seized our coat, we shall surrender him our cloak also rather than subject him to punishment.

"We believe that the penal code of the old covenant--an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth--has been abrogated by Jesus Christ, and that under the new covenant the forgiveness instead of the punishment of enemies has been enjoined on all his disciples in all cases whatsoever. To extort money from enemies, cast them into prison, exile or execute them, is obviously not to forgive but to take retribution.

"The history of mankind is crowded with evidences proving that physical coercion is not adapted to moral regeneration, and that the sinful dispositions of men can be subdued only by love; that evil can be exterminated only by good; that it is not safe to rely upon the strength of an arm to preserve us from harm; that there is great security in being gentle, long- suffering, and abundant in mercy; that it is only the meek who shall inherit the earth; for those who take up the sword shall perish by the sword.

"Hence as a measure of sound policy--of safety to property, life, and liberty--of public quietude and private enjoyment--as well as on the ground of allegiance to Him who is King of kings and Lord of lords, we cordially adopt the non-resistance principle, being confident that it provides for all possible consequences, is armed with omnipotent power, and must ultimately triumph over every assailing force.

"We advocate no Jacobinical doctrines. The spirit of Jacobinism is the spirit of retaliation, violence, and murder. It neither fears God nor regards man. We would be filled with the spirit of Christ. If we abide evil by our fundamental principle of not opposing evil by evil we cannot participate in sedition, treason, or violence. We shall submit to every ordinance and every requirement of government, except such as are contrary to the commands of the Gospel, and in no case resist the operation of law, except by meekly submitting to the penalty of disobedience.

"But while we shall adhere to the doctrine of non-resistance and passive submission to enemies, we purpose, in a moral and spiritual sense, to assail iniquity in high places and in low places, to apply our principles to all existing evil, political, legal, and ecclesiastical institutions, and to hasten the time when the kingdoms of this world will have become the kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ. It appears to us a self-evident truth that whatever the Gospel is designed to destroy at any period of the world, being contrary to it, ought now to be abandoned. If, then, the time is predicted when swords shall be beaten into plowshares and spears into pruning hooks, and men shall not learn the art of war any more, it follows that all who manufacture, sell, or wield these deadly weapons do thus array themselves against the peaceful dominion of the Son of God on earth.

"Having thus stated our principles, we proceed to specify the measures we propose to adopt in carrying our object into effect.

"We expect to prevail through the Foolishness of Preaching. We shall endeavor to promulgate our views among all persons, to whatever nation, sect, or grade of society they may belong. Hence we shall organize public lectures, circulate tracts and publications, form societies, and petition every governing body. It will be our leading object to devise ways and means for effecting a radical change in the views, feelings, and practices of society respecting the sinfulness of war and the treatment of enemies.

"In entering upon the great work before us, we are not unmindful that in its prosecution we may be called to test our sincerity even as in a fiery ordeal. It may subject us to insult, outrage, suffering, yea, even death itself. We anticipate no small amount of misconception, misrepresentation, and calumny. Tumults may arise against us. The proud and pharisaical, the ambitious and tyrannical, principalities and powers, may combine to crush us. So they treated the Messiah whose example we are humbly striving to imitate. We shall not be afraid of their terror. Our confidence is in the Lord Almighty and not in man. Having withdrawn from human protection, what can sustain us but that faith which overcomes the world? We shall not think it strange concerning the fiery trial which is to try us, but rejoice inasmuch as we are partakers of Christ's sufferings.

"Wherefore we commit the keeping of our souls to God. For every one that forsakes houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands for Christ's sake, shall receive a hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life.

"Firmly relying upon the certain and universal triumph of the sentiments contained in this declaration, however formidable may be the opposition arrayed against them, we hereby affix our signatures to it; commending it to the reason and conscience of mankind, and resolving, in the strength of the Lord God, to calmly and meekly abide the issue."

The Crown is not the Queen,,,,Government dissed the Ten Commandments in favour of the Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto

those of you of the oceans
if that's what you believe
it is not too late for you as well 
for you have been deceived


He gives you this fair warning
it is the poor who gave 
now you must give back to them
for no one is your slave


I posted the comments below to a previous response re monarch...but think they are fitting in support of Mrs. Allard's letter as well.....
Further to the below comments, it is timely to report that their is a huge movement afoot by many older senior and near senior people in conjunction with a massive awakening of the sleeping sheep of all ages. Our normally secular liberal governments have dissed God  and His Law...The Ten Commandments for Marxist legalese and his ten planks of the communist manifesto...
I highly recommend you educate yourself and check out this site..... http://www.theblaze.com/stories/are-we-headed-toward-the-constitution-or-the-communist-manifesto-this-breakdown-tells-you/

- June 8, 2012 at 17:10:39
The Crown is not the Queen, the Crown is the Temple Bar located in the City of London....The Queen is the de facto head of state and like the pope a false god. Since the Revisions Act of 1893 and the death of Queen Victoria in 1901, no foreign monarch has had jurisdiction in the colonies....This was further cemented in 1931 with the Statute of Westminster when all colonies were released from British rule to be Sovereign within their spheres...( free with in their own boundaries)... The whole Crown bs is fraud and extortion against the free Christian people. Secular liberalism is a demonic form of government. Our own Provincial governments are selling their own Native ( not just Indian ) peoples into bondage through the creation of the Birth Certificate off of the Certificate of Live Birth and through the Canadian Ownership and Control Determination Act. of 1984....where slavery can be verified.... Check www.bluecollarmovement.blogspot.ca and the March 2012 post showing the values in millions of dollars put on the male and females and a return of 12.3 % per annum.

Response to Gail Shea Minister of National Revenue.....by David Butterfield....disabled flesh man

Response to Gail Shea Minister of National Revenue.....by David Butterfield....

Response to your May 18 letter
Inbox
x

Dave Butterfield
10:22 PM (8 hours ago)

to Dave
Hi all
As some of you may be aware, the CRA has made a fraudulent claim of a tax debt amounting to over 10 grand, including criminal interest rate. They have since threatened garnishment of the Canada Pension sent to me. I wrote an email to the "Min Nat Rev" and the one that
pretends to be that legal fiction, wrote back. You should be able to get the gist of her letter from my response below. This was just sent
out about 10 minutes ago, so it can now be used as an info source for any other. In answer to Brian's likely request, Yes, it can be posted on the Blog at:        http://bluecollarmovement.blogspot.ca/    

It will be interesting to see how she responds.
enjoy
Dave

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Response to your May 18 letter
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 19:07:13 -0700
From: Dave Butterfield <humanrights2010@shaw.ca>
Reply-To: humanrights2010@shaw.ca
To: Gail Shea - Minister Nat Rev <gail.shea@parl.gc.ca>

To: Gail Shea, natural woman and "P.C. M.P.,"  and for provision to all other men and women necessarily involved in the instant matter:
Notice to the Agent is Notice to the Principal and Notice to the Principal is Notice to the Agent.
Reference: Canada Revenue Agency's threat of creating extreme hardship for and risk of death to me, through unlawful garnishment

Preamble:
Prior to your reading this letter of response, kindly read the United Nation's "Convention on the Rights of Disabled Persons", Ratified by "Canada" on March 10, 2010, the purpose of which is: "to promote, protect and ensure the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disabilities, and to promote respect for their inherent dignity.” and; the "International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights", Ratified by "Canada" in August, 1976.  You may also want to peruse the "Optional Protocol" to that Covenant. You should also read the "Charter of the United Nations" and in particular, the section relating to: "A Member of the United Nations which has persistently violated the Principles contained in the present Charter..." and the resulting possibility of the expulsion of a "Member State" from the United Nations, for those persistent violations confirmed by the valid evidence I possess.

Also, kindly refer to the copies you must have, of all medical reports, or of their general content, as furnished by my former doctor to the "Province of British Columbia Ministry of Housing and Social Development" (or whatever they're calling themselves this week) in relation to the multiple disabilities I suffer daily and which, were required for qualification to receive "Provincial disability assistance". If you are not aware of all the disabilities from which I suffer and the fact that I am and have officially been a recipient of that "disability assistance" since 2009, then kindly advise how you expect to ascertain or achieve any level of understanding or assessment of the medical conditions and diseases from which I suffer, my resulting financial situation and the hardships I am already experiencing. By your requirement for me to complete the "Income and Expense/Net Worth Statement" accompanying your letter, it would appear you are without knowledge and operating blindly and completely separate from the entity on whose behalf you also operate, through the illegal delegation of power evidenced by various "Collection Agreements", in the collection of the "internal taxes" known as "Provincial Income Taxes". It should also be noted that I have been ill since at least mid 1999, as evidenced by "Motions" and my doctor's letter filed in Provincial Court of B.C., in or around 1999 - 2000 and yet, I had avoided becoming reliant on any "government assistance" throughout that entire ten year period by my own choice and the kindness of friends who had provided accommodations and gratuitous meals, until I felt I was overstaying their generous welcomes. I am not a "welfare bum", a term too often used when referring to and discriminating against such recipients. I would much rather be healthy and fully capable of supporting my own life, than to rely and become a dependent of any Human Rights violating "government", this in spite of the fact I have remained subject to more than 160 different forms of taxation every day of my 62 years of life in this form of slavery and servitude.

Response:
I have received your letter of response, date stamped as May 18  2012, autographed by you in your capacity of "Member of Parliament"
and not as the "Minister of National Revenue", notwithstanding the letterhead of the document. Is this because the "Minister of National Revenue" has been without a "Ministry" since 1999, with the creation of the "Canada Customs and Revenue Agency" Corporation? Notwithstanding any response you may provide, I write to you now in all of your capacities, including and most importantly, as the naturally created woman who from time to time, rents out her brain to the "legal fictions/artificial persons" called "Member of Parliament" and/or "Minister of National Revenue".

Thank you for your expression of concern for "the difficulties" I am "experiencing". Yes, I guess one could classify "dying", as being one of the greatest "difficulties" one is likely to encounter in "life", although it has become apparent that carrying on effective and productive communications with Officers of your C.R.A., is a close runner-up. Especially since they are the only ones appearing as vultures wanting to feed off any remains of an individual's entire existence. Is the following Article part of the reason why you have defended their "intentions"?  
http://m.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/ndp-demands-canada-wide-probe-of-alleged-corruption-at-tax-agency/article2225683/?service=mobile
 
Aside from your provision of four different addresses, three of which are in foreign "Provincial" jurisdictions (not "provincial" jurisdictions)
and to which, you have directed me to respond, or to forward completed documents, you also provided a contact phone number for
Ms. Parminder Bains, at the Surrey, British Columbia business address. My attempt to contact her at that number brought the same result as achieved every time I have phoned any number at the C.R.A., including that of Mr. Youssef El-Masri, that result being, leaving a message on their "voice mail". I have not been able to make one, single, successful telephone call to any living and relevant human individual at the C.R.A., ever!  As result, I am compelled to believe that none of them ever actually answer their telephones, as a form of "call screening", allowing them to pick and choose those with whom they would find it financially favourable to communicate. I hope my belief is incorrect, as such conduct would not give the appearance of their having intention to perform their duties in a professional manner, in spite of the appearance they operate on some form of "quota and commission" pay scale.

Please be advised, for my own security of person (as a human person), I prefer to conduct any communication with your "government" or
its agencies in writing, not by telephone, as I do not have the legal tender of all others at my disposal, to allow me to buy/own recording equipment, as employed by the C.R.A..  I find the "playing field" under such conditions to be more of a "slippery slope". Also, with the severe short term memory loss I now experience as a side-effect of one or more of the three disabilities from which I suffer daily, it is impossible for me to recall what was said and in some cases, that a conversation even took place. The short term memory loss only affects my recall of recent events, not all that happened or all that I knew prior to its onset. Further, I do not have a printer, or access to one, therefore, writing the letters you have directed me to write to certain of the four different C.R.A. Officers named in your letter, would require hand written letters, which would create great difficulties for me in relation to making any necessary corrections or insertions into previously written text of the hand written letter/correspondence, also creating insufferable degrees of stress and further negative effects on my immune system. Such archaic methods are not only technologically unnecessary, but potentially very costly for all "taxpayers" ("legal fiction/artificial person" terminology your people use to identify the source of their income), as not everyone's hand writing is legible and leaves room for misunderstandings resultant from the Officer's misreading of its text, especially in light of fact that English is a second language to many of them, and in any case, could only lead to further costs in achieving resolve of the matter.

The majority of the business world relies on new, modern technologies such as "email", in carrying on their daily business. Why does the C.R.A. not use this most convenient and most expedient method of communication? They should at least provide a direct email address to allow ongoing communications with the individual they've identified as "taxpayer" and who has become the target of their attention, just as I provided mine to the robot operating on behalf of Ms. Parminder Bains. In corresponding with any of the many types of businesses operating, I am hard pressed to think of one that presents a greater requirement for communications to be in writing, than those exchanged with the C.R.A., notwithstanding the "intention of CRA officials to be" anything "other than professional". I must assume your statement made in this regard, relates to the three recently charged "former CRA officials" who had operated in the criminal world of bribery and kick-backs while employed by the C.R.A.. I must also assume that the fear and intimidation tactics employed by certain "CRA officials" on numerous individuals also labelled as "taxpayers" (or should I say "non-taxpayers") which resulted in their committing suicide (I am aware of at least 12), were not to be included in your generalized statement relating to their having nothing other than "professional" "intention(s)". If email addresses are available for any of those you identified in your letter, then kindly provide or have them provide those email addresses to me. This is also necessary because of the difference in time zones between jurisdictions and the restricted/limited windows of opportunity available to contact even their robot machines during normal business hours. Not to forget the fact that I experience extreme difficulty in sleeping at night, due to my inability to produce the hormone melatonin and have to take supplements. As well, all the other symptoms of malnutrition I experience daily and the muscle seizures experienced when my body becomes horizontal, along with my recognition of the fact that sleeping does nothing to allow me to feel rested upon waking, but rather, to feel just as exhausted as I did the entire day before and the entire day before that. Therefore, I am rarely up and cleared of the melatonin induced brain fog before at least noon my time. The only thing I can predict in or about my life these days, is that it will remain less than worth living until the day I actually do die. You and yours appear promoting of that event.        
"The Colour of Law":
Notwithstanding the "de facto" ("not founded on law" - Barron's Canadian Law Dictionary) status of "Canada's" "Head of State" while giving "Royal Assent" to any Bill that has been passed through Parliament and thereby appearing to make it "law", throughout your letter you have identified your reliance on what is written in and allowed by, what must therefore be called, "de facto legislation" and also, what is not written or not allowed by that type of "legislation". You have thereby made clear, that any "legal action" taken, or proposed to be taken by C.R.A. officials, must appear to be "legally" supported and/or allowed by what is written in "legislation" passed by the Parliament of Canada. I fully understand the "legal" necessity of having everything written so to, in fact, make it "legal" and so everything that is done by the C.R.A., or its officials, can be substantiated, or at least appear as being "legally" valid and to prevent their taking any "illegal" actions against one of their targeted "taxpayers". I am also aware that just because an action is identified as a "legal action", it does not necessarily mean it is a "lawful action". In light of all the above, I am compelled to advise you that I am in possession of written confirmation from the "Legislative Services Branch" of your "Justice Canada", that there is not a single piece of "legislation", nor any written "legal" definition existing anywhere, that  identifies "Canada" as being "legally" comprised of any geographical area commonly called a "province" (please note use of lower-case "p") that would have a name such as: "British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan,..." and so forth. There is nothing that is written anywhere to "legally" confirm otherwise and I hold you to the strict proof of the contrary. Therefore, and since you admit to being a staunch supporter and follower of what is "written" in various legal instruments, I must also ask that you to direct me to the "legislation", "de facto" or "de jure", that would allow the "Canada Revenue Agency" to take any form of "legal" action that would also be "lawful", against any inhabitant of any geographical area that "legally", is not "a part of Canada". Reciprocal Agreements entered into with the City State, the District of Columbia, are not relevant to the instant matter.

I am also compelled to advise that I am aware of the different contexts created by the capitalization of the first letter of any generic geographical term, such as "city, town, state, province", as expressed in the Translation Bureau's publication: "Canadian Style
A Guide to Writing and Editing". Just as I am aware of the change of context resultant from the writing of an alleged "name" of a human person entirely in upper-case lettering, not only making it a non-English "word", but also destroying any ability to identify it as being a "proper noun", "the name of a person, place or thing", and of which, only the first letter is capitalized, not to overlook the fact that such a composition of upper-case letters is a contravention of the "Official Languages Act", by showing total disrespect for the Rules of Grammar of English. In fact, every document created by any "government" contains similar texts written entirely in upper-case lettering, which is not provided for or allowed by those Rules of Grammar of English. My understanding that such compositions of upper-case characters of the English alphabet is only allowed to be used in "Department of National Defence documents" to identify "the specific part of an exercise name", "e.g. Exercise SILENT DEFENDER" and in Admiralty Law, to the names of ships and various other sea going vessels.  

I am also aware that the "government of Canada" has not created a written "legal" definition of the term "Province", as have all "Provincial Legislatures" in their respective "Interpretation Act(s)", while "Canada's" "Interpretation Act", or any other of its "Acts", only provide a written "legal" definition of the term "province", and it does not "include" any geographical area that is commonly called and referred to on the street, as being a "province", as those named above, but rather, it only "includes" the 3 Territories. I am also aware of the proper usage of the term
"includes", as confirmed by the recognized language authority Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage. I am also aware of the two "legal maxims" (a "maxim" is "a set of facts that need no proof", i.e. "step off that cliff and you'll fall to the bottom" - similar to a mathematical axiom, the sum of two equal numbers will always be equal) relative to usage of the term "includes", which are: "the inclusion of one is the exclusion of another" and "the expression of one is the exclusion of another". All of which confirm that when using the term "includes", all of the components that are intended to be seen as being included, must be either written or expressed immediately following the use of that term. I am also aware of two "Supreme Court of Canada" rulings confirming the above proper usage of "includes". I am also aware that there is no such thing as "the government of the province of British Columbia", or "of the province of Alberta", or any other geographical area commonly called a "province" by people on the street. Rather, there are only "governments of the Province of...", all identified "in the corporate sense" by the capitalization of the first letter "P".

I am also aware that all existing "legislation" is under "copyright protection", the purpose of which is only to: "the protection of a private opinion or idea". This in itself poses a serious question as to their being "public laws", and not just "private corporate policies", as a company (a "legal fiction/artificial person"), like "Wal-Mart" might rely upon. Further, if they were true "public laws", Assented to by someone in possession of lawful authority to make them "laws", then they would belong to us all and could not qualify or be subject to copyright protection. It would also allow individuals to acquire the "Official Version(s)" without having to pay again in order to get it and thereby remove those financial restrictions, resulting in reduced numbers of people who would live in "ignorance of the law". I am also aware that the entire operation of the current system is totally reliant on the population remaining in that ignorance in order to financially sustain the fictional entities the system has created. Those being the "legal fictions/artificial persons", such as the ones that you, from time to time, pretend to be, by acting in their capacities. The fact that you are merely "acting" confirms that you, the natural woman, have no authority over anyone, only the "legal fiction/artificial person" has what must then be, "fictional" or "artificial" authority, as assigned it by the respective de facto legislation, or otherwise, "artificial law". This is supported by fact that one cannot do physical harm to the "State", as it is merely a "fiction", an "artificial person" that is not capable of feeling or thinking anything and has no life or real property that could be subject to threat.    

Along with all of the foregoing, there is also the issue of each and every "government" being Registered as a "Company" in both the United States Security and Exchange Commission, where "Canada" shows its "Business Address" as "Washington, D.C.", and also in Dunn & Bradstreet, where all "Provincial Ministries" are identified with a phrase to the effect: "BRITISH COLUMBIA PROVINCE OF also traded as..." and followed by the name of the particular "Ministry". These Registrations provide clear indication that there are no true and lawfully constituted "governments de jure" operating in any geographical area that is believed to be "a part of Canada", but rather and only,
out-for-profit, pure corporations. Further, and in light of "Canada's" "Business Address", it appears possible that it is a direct subsidiary corporation of the "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION". Heaven only knows, or should I say Hell only knows, the actual implications of this fact. After all, having a "Business Address" within a known "City State", a totally autonomous entity that is not a part of any country, certainly disables ones ability to recognize "the government of Canada" as being a valid and lawfully constituted true government, of any kind, or at all. Perhaps this also provides reason for the de facto status held by the one acting in capacity of "Canada's Head of State".

As a result of all of the above facts, established and confirmed by many of your "government's" own legal instruments, it is necessary for you  to provide copies of or direction to, valid and lawful, written evidence to the contrary, including any true "public laws" Assented to by one in
de jure possession of the sovereign power. This is necessary to remove any potential for my reliance on Section 15 of the Criminal Code of Canada, entitled: "Obedience to de facto law".

I am also aware of the Legal Maxim: "Jurisdiction once challenged must be proved". This letter of response is intended to challenge your jurisdiction and that of your "government" and to provide you the opportunity to establish as fact, that you, in any of your official capacities, or any Agent acting on behalf of, or "in the service of" "the government of Canada", is in possession of the necessary de jure authority to make any kind of demand on any individual who is not "in the service of the government of Canada" or of a "Province" and has not knowingly waived their Human Rights and entered into any form of "master/servant employment relationship" with either such "government". Only the provision of this valid evidence will free you and others involved from liability for the Human Rights violations committed against all natural men and women forced to deal with demands placed on them by your "government" and any of it's Agents. This liability exists in spite of any "official capacity" claimed at the time of the alleged violations. You are hereby Noticed of this challenge and opportunity for disclosure.

I am confident in your ability to comprehend what I have reported here, as your knowledge and understanding of the "Income Tax Act" comprised of more than 1400 pages of extremely ambiguous language (contrary to "Maxwell's Interpretation of Statutes"), plus 483 pages of Income Tax Application Rules and Regulations and 35 remission orders, must surely speak to your competence in easily comprehending written materials. No "Interpretation" section is necessary to the comprehension of matters involved in this letter, as I have written and re-written it over a five day period, in the plainest form of English possible, considering the subject matter to which it relates and the conditions from which, I suffer every moment.

I await your only appropriate response and provision of the above identified valid documents necessary to establish your lawful authority and jurisdiction over me, a natural man, who is not "in the service of" any "government", de facto or de jure and who knows and exercises all Natural and Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

Further Notice:
I have notified my friends and relatives that in the event of my death, they should do whatever is necessary to ascertain the reason for my death, not just the cause, and if it is determined in any way related to any action(s) taken by any individual while "in the service of the government of Canada" or of any other "government", they should file a lawsuit for "Wrongful Death", against the individuals named in this and other correspondence relative to the instant matter, in their private capacities as men and woman and not as the "legal fictions/artificial persons" that they, from time to time, pretend to be. As a "legal fiction/artificial person" is not capable of violating anything or causing anyone's death and only a man or woman could be answer-able for such conduct and its results.

                                                                                                                            Giving respect where due,
                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                            David Butterfield, natural man, and;
                                                                                                                            Defender of all Human Rights.

Request evidence of Queen's approval of appointment of Governor General

Subject:  Request evidence of Queen's approval of appointment

His Excellency

The Right Honourable David Johnston, C.C., C.M.M., C.O.M., C.D.
Governor General of Canada

Dear Sir,

As an Educator and Defender of Natural and Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, with approximately
20 years involvement, it is necessary for me to possess full comprehension of Canadian law and to confirm its compliance with international instruments, including those Ratified by the Canadian government. This is not an easy task and necessitates this communication.

My questions here relate to those international instruments, and in particular, the "Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples", adopted by the U.N. General Assembly resolution 1514(XV) of 14 December 1960. For your convenience
I quote here the text of Article 1 of that Declaration:

     "1. The subjection of peoples to alien subjugation, domination and exploitation constitutes a denial of fundamental human rights,
          is contrary to the Charter of the United Nations and is an impediment to the promotion of world peace and co-operation."

This appears in direct conflict with conditions existing here in Canada, as all taxes are levied in the name of and all criminal charges are
deemed to be an offence against, the Queen of England. The fact that "income" (people's property) derived from the exchange of their

labour and skills (people's property) is taxed in the name of, and therefore, on behalf of a foreign Monarch, appears as evidence that
the people's labour and skills are being "exploited" by the one in whose name and behalf, that tax is levied. It is bad enough that the
government of Canada has clearly made a law "in relation to" "Property and Civil Rights", one of the "Exclusive Powers of Provincial
Legislatures", in spite of any Supreme Court of Canada ruling deeming their income tax "constitutionally valid", which flies in the face
of the "purpose and intent" of the B.N.A. Act, 1867, as confirmed in its 2nd Reading, by Henry Howard Molyneaux, February 19, 1867.
The fact that income, labour and skills are "property" is confirmed in Provincial Statutes, also in my possession.

All of the above also appears in direct conflict with the effects of the "Statute Laws Revision Act, 1893, 56-57 Vict., c. 14 (U.K.)" involving
the Repeal of Section 2 of the "British North America Act, 1867" (B.N.A. Act, 1867) the text of that Repealed section read as follows:
"The Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen extend also to the Heirs and Successors of Her Majesty, Kings and Queens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland."   Myself and others are of the opinion that this Repeal effectively restricted any reference to the "Queen", as found in the B.N.A. Act, 1867, to Queen Victoria only and since no Amendment has been passed to give the term "Queen" any other designation, it still only refers to Queen Victoria and of course, she died in 1901. Her death effectively removed any purpose for the continued presence of the term "Queen", as it no longer refers to anyone.

Question: So, how exactly does Elizabeth ll, "legally" and "lawfully" possess any authority in Canada and over Canadian people?
Question: If She does, where is evidence of that "legal" and "lawful" authority over otherwise free and sovereign people, to be found?

Still further, the "Statute of Westminster, 1931", signed by King George V, and which, came into force December 11, 1931, effectively
released all Colonies and their peoples from being subject to the Monarchy of the United Kingdom through that King's abdication of his sovereign power, thereby providing independence to the Colonies and their people. It also forbid any further use of the term "Colony" in any instrument passed in the U.K. Parliament, put the B.N.A. Act, 1867, on Reserve, effectively ending the Colonial Union it had created and as confirmed by the first sentence of that Act, partially quoted here:  "An Act for the Union...".  

All of this has also been confirmed by former M.P., Walter Kuhl, considered by Members of the House of Commons to be the constitutional law expert of Canada at the time, in his Presentation to the House, November 8th, 1945.  Although the King's abdication of his sovereign power was initially deemed "not legally possible" by Canada's government of the time and based on legal "opinions" they solicited, it has since been confirmed by Peter Hogg, current constitutional law expert and Dean of Osgoode Hall, in his book: "Constitutional Law of Canada", where he states, to the effect, "...now, the more widely held belief is that he did."  It seems common-sensible that one holding "the sovereign power" can legally and lawfully do with it, as they think fit.  Hogg also confirms therein, that "For practical purposes, however, the Queen's role for Canada is primarily as a ceremonial head of the Commonwealth, the Commonwealth being an informal association of countries that were formerly members of the old British Empire.", making it crystal clear that said "Queen" is without any lawful authority at all in Canada.  He also confirms that the majority of Canada's constitutional laws are not "Canadian" at all, as they are found in the Statute Books of the United Kingdom. Perhaps this is part of the reason M.P.'s in the U.K.'s Parliament shouted things like: "This is a fraud on the Canadian people", when Trudeau was there in 1982.  Not only that, even the people of Iraq were allowed to vote on their newly written constitution after Hussein was toppled. It seems they have greater democratic rights than we do in "Canada".    

Question: So, how is it then that we remain under the "subjugation, domination and exploitation" of that "Queen" through being taxed in her name and on her behalf, every single day of our lives?

There is also the question involving the Governor General of Canada's time to time status held, as "Canada's de facto Head of State", notwithstanding the admission of that fact having been removed from the G.G.'s Official Website, that status remains. Barron's Canadian Law Dictionary defines "de facto" as meaning "not founded on law" and that is most troubling.   Based on all of the facts stated above (and many not stated here), it appears that "de facto" status held while acting in capacity of "Canada's Head of State", is well founded, both in law and
in fact. To complicate matters even more, there is also section 15 of the Criminal Code of Canada entitled: "Obedience to de facto law".


Question: As result of all the above, I am compelled to request a Certified True Copy of the document(s) bearing the autograph of Queen Elizabeth ll, whereby the approval of your appointment, let alone the existence of your Office, has been legally and lawfully approved by
that Queen.

I thank you in advance for your time spent reading and providing appropriate response to the questions presented in this communication.
Please be assured, I have no ill intentions toward you personally and no desire to create any form of confrontation with you, I only seek
factual truths to the purpose of assuring true justice for all people, through their being allowed full realization of all of their Human Rights
and Fundamental Freedoms.

Thank you again,

David Butterfield
Educator and Defender of Natural and Universally Recognized Human Rights
and Fundamental Freedoms

Authorized by Declaration of the United Nations General Assembly

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Governor General's  pass the buck response ...


   
On 15/05/2012 7:34 AM, Info wrote:
Dear Mr. Butterfield,



On behalf of the Office of the Secretary to the Governor General, I am responding to your email below. I apologize for the delayed reply.



While we appreciate your inquiries, this matter would be best addressed to Library and Archives Canada, at the following address:



Library and Archives Canada

395 Wellington Street

Ottawa, ON  K1A 0N4



Tel:             1-866-578-7777       (toll-free in Canada)

Fax: 613-995-6274

Website: www.collectionscanada.gc.ca



I hope this will be helpful to you.



Please accept my best wishes.



Yours sincerely,


Antoine Morin - INFO
Rideau Hall
1 Sussex Drive / 1, promenade Sussex
Ottawa (Ontario)  K1A 0A1
info@gg.ca

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter | Suivez-nous sur Facebook et Twitter
GGDavidJohnston    | RideauHall
From: Dave Butterfield [mailto:humanrights2010@shaw.ca]
Sent: February 24, 2012 5:55 PM
To: Info

Subject: evidence of Queen's approval of appointment

His Excellency

The Right Honourable David Johnston, C.C., C.M.M., C.O.M., C.D.
Governor General of Canada

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Response to Governor General.....by Dave Butterfield....

Dave Butterfield humanrights2010@shaw.ca

4:29 PM (58 minutes ago)

to Info 

To Antoine and his corporate de facto master,

I am appalled by your suggestion, it is little more than another version of every politician's favourite dance, the "Political Sidestep".

The Library and Archives cannot and will not answer all of these questions appropriately, but now, they really don't need to.

It is clear that your "Office" is trying to hide something. Something that many of us "out here" already know all about.

Something that has already been established through other processes and which, resulted in an International Notary's issuance and 

service of a "Certificate of Dishonour" and "Administrative Judgment by Estoppel" on the de facto Attorney's General of the "Canada" 

and of the corporate government de facto of "the Province of British Columbia".      

You and yours have had your opportunity to address the issues presented, but you failed to do so and chose to "pass the buck".

Legal Maxim: "He who is silent is understood to agree."  Passing the buck is not an appropriate response, especially not from a highly 

educated an extremely knowledgeable individual such as your corporate de facto master. This is the same method used by the corporate governments de facto in getting people to voluntarily be "in the service of" their corporate structures. People who don't say "no", are 

deemed to have said "yes".   

  

The evidence presented below is enough to convince any Jury of the fraud to which, we have and are all being made victims.

Without a denial, supported by evidence contrary to that provided, and coming directly from your "de facto Head of State",

he is then seen to agree with the evidence reported to him.   Estoppel in pais will be applied.

In my highly educated opinion, it is clear that the "de facto Head of State" is just another self-serving politician, he is definitely not a "lawful" representative, or acting on behalf of anyone, especially not some foreign and bogus "Queen" who violated her Coronation Oath almost immediately after swearing to uphold it. The World Book Dictionary defines "politician" as: "a person who takes public office for short term interest or personal gain."  

The old adage "Lies go around the world while truth is still putting its boots on." is on its last legs already.

The "cat is out of the bag" now, good luck trying to catch it to put it back in it.

                                                                                                                            Giving respect only where due,

                                                                                                                            David Butterfield

 

     

Web sites of learning

http://eternallyaware.com/canada.html
www.allcreatorsgifts.org
www.detaxcanada.org
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/
http://www.natural-person.ca/

The Parliament of CANADA is a corporation trading for profit on the stock exchange using a rewrite of the foreign investment act of 1933 when CANADA ceded it's gold to the creditor ruling banking families who is the federal reserve act of 1913 subjected our once free independant nation to usury..

The rewritten Foreign Investments Act of 1933 is now know as The Canadian Ownership and Control Determination Act and was rewritten in 1984 and does indeed show persons owning persons= slavery
Go to March 2012 post and open file on third party demands and in the 16 pages is the rate chart of male and females that the minister refers to in this presentment...Thank you minister for this great work.


Hello Laurie, minister Belanger here..this is the package I was referring to indicating the false oathed fraud  we have running the Provincial corporations...God set commands inclusive of not adding to his law Laurie Deuteronomy 4;2 12:32.  The Queen via that Coronation oath swore to uphold them with all of her power....The Parliament of CANADA is a corporation trading for profit on the stock exchange using a rewrite of the foreign investment act of 1933 when CANADA ceded it's gold to the creditor ruling banking families who is the federal reserve act of 1913 subjected our once free independant nation to usury....We had no interest on loans from the Bank of CANADA before 1913..that usury is a violation of God's directions and has brought the world to ruin,,,The word "Includes is especially important for you to grasp as all the codes rules and regulations of corporations are only applicable upon persons..I have included the Marque law review of 1931"Expressio Unius Est Exclusio Alterus" for a precise explanation of what that word means as it is absolutely necessary in order for you to grasp what I am saying..If you think it include a bunch of other stuff other than what is mentioned your wrong! ..You may think you know what the word person means but as you will soon see you do not...

.Persons are not respected by God in the Bible as Deuteronomy 1:17;10:17 ;Matthew 22:16 Acts 10:34 Romans 2:11 and finally James 2:1-9..I as a follower of Christ cannot show respect for persons....Person includes a corporation...Note the word also is not in section 35 in the interpretation acts definition of person...We are left top conclude that only corporations which asre dead in law are called persons in Canadian law...That is not an assumption despite what your assumptions in your mind regarding the meaning of the word Includes.  If we are unaware of the implications of that word includes then quite simply we cannot correctly interpret the law,,,Persons have their names formed as if they were dead....HAWN Laurie..Like in obituary Columns or grave stones ..and that is what appears on your drivers license being a permission to do a thing normally illegal...The constitution is a commercial law for commercial entities and does not apply to men and women...You doubt??? http://www.pch.gc.ca/ddp-hrd/canada/guide/appl-eng.cfm   A person according to Canadian commercial law includes a corporation.  See Interpretation act section 35

When  God says to not add to his law and the Queen swore to defend it is was not for looks...or was it?  If i am intimidated by men to submit to the laws of as corporation and forsake God they are engaeged in treason as her Majesties government is not of men but of God....Your parliament seems to be bluffing it's way into power on the flesh of it''s constitutors,,( Good word to look up)

 The Presenting of the Holy Bible

When the Queen is again seated, the Archbishop shall go to her Chair; and the Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, receiving the Bible from the Dean of Westminster, shall bring it to the Queen and present it to her, the Archbishop saying these words:

Our gracious Queen:
to keep your Majesty ever mindful of the law and the Gospel of God
as the Rule for the whole life and government of Christian Princes,
we present you with this Book,
the most valuable thing that this world affords.

And the Moderator shall continue:
Here is Wisdom;
This is the royal Law;
These are the lively Oracles of God. \


Going through COCADA in the definitions and in the regulations  pages 53-57 being the rewrite of the foreign investment Act of 1933. being the year of our formal Bankruptsy and subsequential ceding to the registry of the United States Securities Exchange commission asa per section 11 of their Articles of Independance  ,  you will see person owning persons...You will see in the 1984 regulations the value of life for men and women starting with 7 digits at 12.3 % per annum annuities,,,,This is bondage by unaware consent....registration effects the sale of men and women via Leviticus 25:44-50 that got their names altered at birth to dead legal fiction formations ,,,,The owners of the world Bank follow Talmud...If you think this is racial discrimination you are correct..Gentiles are considerd animals..Please read this direct from their Talmud,,, http://www.rense.com/general86/talmd.htm  through the   the receiver general of CANADA and as creditor they own CANADA as a debtor and via fraud and intimidation extract taxes of a high degree  to pay the interest on the debt,,Usury is even just 1 penny on the dollar Laurie ...not 45 percent...

Section 2 of the BNA Act was repealed in 1893 which states:
Section 2, repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, 56-57 Vict., c. 14 (U.K.), read as follows:

2. The Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen extend also to the Heirs and Successors of Her Majesty, Kings and Queens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.

Canada does not have a Monarch because when Queen Victoria Died in 1901, so did the provisions of this Act to the British Monarchy.