Web sites of learning

http://eternallyaware.com/canada.html
www.allcreatorsgifts.org
www.detaxcanada.org
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/
http://www.natural-person.ca/

The Parliament of CANADA is a corporation trading for profit on the stock exchange using a rewrite of the foreign investment act of 1933 when CANADA ceded it's gold to the creditor ruling banking families who is the federal reserve act of 1913 subjected our once free independant nation to usury..

The rewritten Foreign Investments Act of 1933 is now know as The Canadian Ownership and Control Determination Act and was rewritten in 1984 and does indeed show persons owning persons= slavery
Go to March 2012 post and open file on third party demands and in the 16 pages is the rate chart of male and females that the minister refers to in this presentment...Thank you minister for this great work.


Hello Laurie, minister Belanger here..this is the package I was referring to indicating the false oathed fraud  we have running the Provincial corporations...God set commands inclusive of not adding to his law Laurie Deuteronomy 4;2 12:32.  The Queen via that Coronation oath swore to uphold them with all of her power....The Parliament of CANADA is a corporation trading for profit on the stock exchange using a rewrite of the foreign investment act of 1933 when CANADA ceded it's gold to the creditor ruling banking families who is the federal reserve act of 1913 subjected our once free independant nation to usury....We had no interest on loans from the Bank of CANADA before 1913..that usury is a violation of God's directions and has brought the world to ruin,,,The word "Includes is especially important for you to grasp as all the codes rules and regulations of corporations are only applicable upon persons..I have included the Marque law review of 1931"Expressio Unius Est Exclusio Alterus" for a precise explanation of what that word means as it is absolutely necessary in order for you to grasp what I am saying..If you think it include a bunch of other stuff other than what is mentioned your wrong! ..You may think you know what the word person means but as you will soon see you do not...

.Persons are not respected by God in the Bible as Deuteronomy 1:17;10:17 ;Matthew 22:16 Acts 10:34 Romans 2:11 and finally James 2:1-9..I as a follower of Christ cannot show respect for persons....Person includes a corporation...Note the word also is not in section 35 in the interpretation acts definition of person...We are left top conclude that only corporations which asre dead in law are called persons in Canadian law...That is not an assumption despite what your assumptions in your mind regarding the meaning of the word Includes.  If we are unaware of the implications of that word includes then quite simply we cannot correctly interpret the law,,,Persons have their names formed as if they were dead....HAWN Laurie..Like in obituary Columns or grave stones ..and that is what appears on your drivers license being a permission to do a thing normally illegal...The constitution is a commercial law for commercial entities and does not apply to men and women...You doubt??? http://www.pch.gc.ca/ddp-hrd/canada/guide/appl-eng.cfm   A person according to Canadian commercial law includes a corporation.  See Interpretation act section 35

When  God says to not add to his law and the Queen swore to defend it is was not for looks...or was it?  If i am intimidated by men to submit to the laws of as corporation and forsake God they are engaeged in treason as her Majesties government is not of men but of God....Your parliament seems to be bluffing it's way into power on the flesh of it''s constitutors,,( Good word to look up)

 The Presenting of the Holy Bible

When the Queen is again seated, the Archbishop shall go to her Chair; and the Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, receiving the Bible from the Dean of Westminster, shall bring it to the Queen and present it to her, the Archbishop saying these words:

Our gracious Queen:
to keep your Majesty ever mindful of the law and the Gospel of God
as the Rule for the whole life and government of Christian Princes,
we present you with this Book,
the most valuable thing that this world affords.

And the Moderator shall continue:
Here is Wisdom;
This is the royal Law;
These are the lively Oracles of God. \


Going through COCADA in the definitions and in the regulations  pages 53-57 being the rewrite of the foreign investment Act of 1933. being the year of our formal Bankruptsy and subsequential ceding to the registry of the United States Securities Exchange commission asa per section 11 of their Articles of Independance  ,  you will see person owning persons...You will see in the 1984 regulations the value of life for men and women starting with 7 digits at 12.3 % per annum annuities,,,,This is bondage by unaware consent....registration effects the sale of men and women via Leviticus 25:44-50 that got their names altered at birth to dead legal fiction formations ,,,,The owners of the world Bank follow Talmud...If you think this is racial discrimination you are correct..Gentiles are considerd animals..Please read this direct from their Talmud,,, http://www.rense.com/general86/talmd.htm  through the   the receiver general of CANADA and as creditor they own CANADA as a debtor and via fraud and intimidation extract taxes of a high degree  to pay the interest on the debt,,Usury is even just 1 penny on the dollar Laurie ...not 45 percent...

Section 2 of the BNA Act was repealed in 1893 which states:
Section 2, repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, 56-57 Vict., c. 14 (U.K.), read as follows:

2. The Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen extend also to the Heirs and Successors of Her Majesty, Kings and Queens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.

Canada does not have a Monarch because when Queen Victoria Died in 1901, so did the provisions of this Act to the British Monarchy.

NDP demands Canada-wide probe of alleged corruption at tax agency

http://m.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/ndp-demands-canada-wide-probe-of-alleged-corruption-at-tax-agency/article2225683/?service=mobile

cc: every MP in Canada
      every BCM member
      others

The light is shining into the all seeing eyes

Just for the record, Quebec may be the focus BUT the Halifax office has some of the biggest criminals. They create false bills against small family business owners and in their Marxist mentality try to destroy everything that is to do with free enterprise. They are criminals and are being aided and abetted by the prosecution departments and the banks. I personally contacted a Senior Crown in early April and he said he "can not and will not" get involved with a cra issue....pretty much says that the CRA AGENTS are above the law.....UNTIL NOW    Speak out against injustice
I have forwarded information to every MP in Canada and it is nice to see the NDP are pushing for justice and not just us ....
Some tidbits:.
In order for a cra agent to access your "private bank" information, they are required to get a "production order" signed by a Justice of the peace.....
Any information gathered from your bank account without a production order has no force in law...= illegal search and seizure...
The Federal Government is mandated to "create the nations money " equal to the GDP and does not need to borrow and pay interest...Section 91 of the BNA...so they need not tax...it is in violation and usury is condemned in law...KJV.
The Queen of England has no authority in the colonies since 1931
The colonies never federated as Quebec did not sign on
The Supreme Court can not exist before a "constitution"
A constitution is a set of rules that the governments must follow and "acts and statutes" come out of the constitution....
Three levels of government...The Legislative...make the laws.....The Administrative...enforce the laws....The Judiciary interprets the laws ......the judiciary can not exist before the other two.

Documents reveal hundreds of ‘high-risk misconduct’ cases at CRA

Porisky gets 4.5 years for telling the truth...He is not the strawman that was created off of his certificate of live birth and proof is in the Canadian Ownership and Control Determination Act  and the Regulations show the value of the person.( can be seen at bluecollarmovement.blogspot.ca  click on March 2012 and then third party demands and yoou will see the rerulations and values in the 16 pages there.......the Golden Calf is alive but maybe not for much longer.....CRA agents are being found out.

http://m.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/ndp-demands-canada-wide-probe-of-alleged-corruption-at-tax-agency/article2225683/?service=mobile

The Statute of Westminster ended the need for existence of the "Central Legislature"

Question…..
Since the “patriation” of Canada in 1982 we were told we have a constitution.  Since it was from the united kingdom, wouldn’t “Canada” have to be a foreign power as it is their statute ?? …….de-facto government.  Isn’t that why they need us to consent to everything?? Isn’t that how they stomp on our basic rights??




From: Dave Butterfield [mailto:humanrights2010@shaw.ca]
Sent: May-12-12 4:48 PM
To: Darren Martin
Subject: Re: they stomp because we don't say "no"

There is much more to it than just the acts of fraud you listed.

1st. "Legally" the BNA Act is still on "Reserve", as one of the effects of the Statute of Westminster, 1931, so it wasn't available
        for any "Amendments" in 1982.

2nd. If the BNA Act was written and intended to be a "Constitution Act", it would have been called that from its inception.
       It wasn't, it was simply a British Statute allowing the creation of a "Colonial Union", all that was legally possible at the time
       due to the Agent (operating with delegated power from Monarchy) status held by all Colonial governments.

3rd. The Statute of Westminster ended the need for existence of the "Central Legislature" (which illegally and unlawfully calls itself the
       "federal government") and the "Office of Governor General", by its granting of independence to all British Colonies, which
       effectively and legally, dissolved the "Colonial Union". As independent nations they were no longer "Colonies" and therefore,
       could not legally continue to participate in any "Colonial Union".

4th. The above is part of the reason that the "Canada", cannot be and is not legally defined, as being comprised of geographical areas
       called "provinces" that have names such as: "British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan,..." etcetera, as confirmed by Justice Canada in  
       the email exchange I had with them, which is included in my booklet "The Great Deception Exposed"

5th  The above is also part of the reason that the "Canada" does not have a legal definition for the term "Province", as used in section
      92 of the BNA Act, 1867.  They are not legally related or connected, one does not exist within the legal realm of the other, except through
      Contracts and Memorandums of Understanding that they have entered with and between each other. While some of their statutes
      do use the term "Province", it is not defined, but only used to relate to the "former Province of Canada". Which was "Upper and Lower
      Canada", the original and initial Union between Ontario and Quebec. Still though, the capital "P", indicates the term is being "used in
      the corporate sense", and therefore, no lawful authority over the land and its inhabitants could exist as a possession of a corporation.

6th  The "Canada" is an "Agent" of a foreign power, namely the money powers, otherwise referred as the "CROWN", or "The City",
      or the "One Square Mile" (in the centre of the city of London). This is why they agreed to promote their non-negotiable and
      non-redeemable "legal tender", by borrowing it into circulation and creating a national debt to financially enslave the population
      to that "CROWN". The "CROWN" is an autonomous entity, a "City State", not part of any country, just as is the "District of Columbia"
      and the "Vatican City".

7th  The status of "de facto" held by the Governor General of Canada whenever that entity acts in capacity of "Canada's Head of State"
      in either opening or closing Parliament, or in providing "Royal Assent" to any Bill that has passed through Parliament, is confirmation
      of the fact that the "Queen of England", has no lawful authority in or over the inhabitants of any geographical area commonly called
      a "province", which is also substantiated by the independent status granted them by the Statute of Westminster, 1931. Ask anyone,
      we are no longer "British Subjects", and therefore, are no longer "Subject" to the "British" Monarchy, or the laws of Britain, or the
      United Kingdom.  The people of every "province", are free of any authority over them, other than their own.

8th  While our "consent" is relied upon heavily by them in order to impose their form of slavery upon us all, that consent is normally
      received from us in the form of "tacit consent", or by our silence. Because of the fact that there is no existing evidence to establish that
      "Canada" is a real "country" with a true "government de jure", there is also no evidence that they can even speak to us with purpose
      of getting our consent, tacit or otherwise, about anything, for any reason. All that the available evidence shows, is their foreign corporate
      status. Remember too, even as a "Party" to the United Nations, "Canada" is also referred in the corporate sense as: "a Member State".

Hope that adds some clarity on the matter. I am certain there is more, perhaps in my "Challenge of Jurisdiction and Lawful Authority", but
I have something I have to get done right now and can't put it off, lest I forget about it completely.

ens legis Vs sui juris plus the Official Language Act

ens legis Vs sui juris plus the Official Language Act



All documents are in ens legis to the straw man created off off the certificate of live birth....the newer date on the Birth certificate is the date of the creation of the ens legis....  The name is written JOHN DOE as the birth of the flesh "sui juris " is the earlier date and is spelled John Doe....John Doe has free will and is exempt from levy....All bills are sent to ens legis, all tax returns are ens legis and the census calls for you to fill it in in all capital letters...in other words ens legis...the fiction....Are you a fiction or an I AM....
Legalize is a foreign language see below.......

definitions :


SUI JURIS
One who has all the rights to which a freemen is entitled; one who is not under the power of another, as a slave, a minor, and the like.

To make a valid contract, a person must, in general, be sui juris. Every one of full age is presumed to be sui juris.

--b--

“Ens legis. L. Lat. A creature of the law; an  artificial being, as contrasted with a
natural person. Applied to corporations, considered as deriving their existence
entirely from the law.”  Black’s Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition, 1951, hereinafter
“Black’s 4
th.”
‘‘Ens legis’’ is the precise legal description of the ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS-NAME,
straw man, trade name.
ANALYZING THE OBVIOUS
    Examine all your  corporate papers, driver’s license, credit cards, bank statements,
traffic tickets, and government agencies. They all insist on dealing with you only in all
caps for contracts, accounts, etc. The military also designates its personnel exclusively in
all caps. ....

Legalize is a foreign language and requires its own law dictionary .......according to the Official Languages Act, you are entitled to have your court hearing in one of the two official languages...ie' French or English....Legalize is not permitted.......


Official Languages Act (Canada)


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Official Languages Act is a Canadian law that came into force on September 9, 1969,[1] which gives English and French equal status in the government of Canada.[2] This makes them "official" languages, having preferred status in law over all other languages. Although the Official Languages Act is not the only piece of federal language law, it is the legislative keystone of Canada's official bilingualism. It was substantially amended in 1988.
Contents  [hide]
1 Summary of main features
2 Political context
3 Failure to implement all provisions of the Official Languages Act
4 Reactions
4.1 Provincial legislatures
4.2 Poll data on public reactions
5 Notes
6 See also
7 External links
8 Related link
[edit]Summary of main features

The Act[3] provides, among other things,
that Canadians have the right to receive services from federal departments and from Crown corporations in both official languages;
that Canadians will be able to be heard before federal courts in the official language of their choice;
that Parliament will adopt laws and to publish regulations in both official languages, and that both versions will be of equal legal weight;
that English and French will have equal status of languages of work within the federal public service within geographically defined parts of the country that are designated bilingual (most notably in National Capital Region, Montreal and New Brunswick), as well as in certain overseas government offices and in parts of the country where there is sufficient demand for services in both official languages. In remaining geographical areas, the language of work for federal public servants is French (in Quebec) and English (elsewhere);

Ex-Canada Revenue workers face corruption charges

Ignore at your peril

These creeps were not "ex" initially....They were caught and they are only a very small amount of the criminal creeps that are destroying the families and working class. They create false bills which is in defiance of section 137 of the criminal code of Canada... "fabricating evidence" and they are well aware that the "income tax act" NEVER received Royal Assent....and further, any "third party demands " issued since 1994.....ie: to your employer or bank or customers...demanding they pay your money to them is against the law......Go to bluecollarmovement.blogspot.ca and click on March 2012 and third party demand link...there are 16 pages there Note section 227 (10.5) repealed and that is proof in Law.taken direct from the Income Tax Act in early March 2012..The blending of the Provincial and Federal exclusive powers per Section 91 and 92 re the taxes is 100 % against the Constitution and must be repealed..
Section 52 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms says...." The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect"......Direct tax is exclusive and non transferable and belongs solely to the provinces.....as per section 92 of the Constitution....Indirect taxation is exclusive and solely belongs the the Dominion..to wit..the Federal government....under Section 91...BUT also the Fed has the exclusive non transferable power to "create the nations money without borrowing...and are prohibited from transferring that power.".
The Supreme Court rued on this in 1950 in the Lord Nelson Vs the Attorney General for Canada and the Attorney General for Nova Scotia

..CRA is a collection agency for the world bank and is not a Federal Government entity.....All will burn eternally in hell......tee hee..oh yeah the bankers will be there as well as every Liberal politician back to the beginning of time..... Ignorance of the law is no excuse....

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2012/05/01/corruption-canada-revenue-rcmp-charges.html

The investigation was launched in 2008 after allegations of corruption against the former employees were reported to the CRA. (CBC)

Facebook

13

Twitter

1


Share

14

Email

Three former Canada Revenue Agency employees have been charged with corruption and fraud for allegedly trying to extort money from restaurant owners in exchange for lower tax assessments.

The RCMP-led "Project Coche" resulted in 12 charges filed against the former employees Tuesday.

“It’s all the same type of pattern that they all [allegedly] did,” said RCMP Cpl. Luc Thibault.

One of the accused, a 55-year-old former tax auditor who was let go from the CRA in 2011 during the RCMP investigation, allegedly offered a restaurant owner to lower his upcoming tax notice in exchange for $90,000, according to police.

The restaurant owner declined the deal.

A 50-year-old team leader, also “discharged” from the CRA 2011, allegedly received $100,000 in bribes from a Montreal restaurant owner between June 2007 and August 2008 to erase unreported income from the file.

The third accused, a 50-year-old tax auditor who resigned in 2009, allegedly offered to lower a bogus tax notice in exchange for $50,000 in 2006. The restaurant owner refused to pay, according to the RCMP.

Complaint launched investigation
Police said the investigation into corruption at the CRA started in 2008 after a complaint came into the agency alleging the accused were involved in criminal activities.

“More charges could be laid in this matter,” Thibault said. “It’s still under investigation, so I can’t say much on that, but there could be more charges.”

Francesco Fazio, 55, and Elias Kawkab, 50, both of Ville Saint-Laurent, and Luigi Falcone, 50, of Laval face charges ranging from extortion to bribery of officers, fraud against the government and breach of trust by a public officer.

All three are scheduled to appear in court in Montreal in June.