The information I hereby supply has taken many many years of research by countless people from all walks of life . Some have studied constitutional issues while others have looked into political as well as religious issues. I have been fortunate enough and interested enough to have been able to tap into the work of others as well as my own research and have a fair knowledge as to why things are as they are.The bottom line is that it is all about the money
ALL ABOUT THE MONEY
The only true currency in the world is labor. In 1933 , 33rd degree mason Franklin Delano Roosevelt took substance out of money .Under HJR-192 [ house joint resolution 192 ] money was no longer backed by gold or silver and all people were to surrender their gold/silver to the banker or be levied a 10, 000.00 fine.The money that we currently use is called fiat [ counterfeit ] and is not backed by any substance therefore it is worthless . Its only value is in its acceptance by the people .We do not need to use this currency and many regions are producing their own and trading amongst themselves with usury free creations.Google up LETS [ local economic trade systems] for more info .Also check out http://www.cyberclass.net/ .Christ said give unto Cesar that which is Cesars .It is time to give it all back by our non acceptance and issuing our own means of trade usury free .
WHERE IT ALL BEGAN
As you are aware , our ancestors left despotic , tyrannical government overseas for a new world here .The colonies needed money in the short term to be able to acquire the necessities to build this nation . They borrowed actual silver from the English and this substance backed money had interest attached.Since they borrowed the principal sum for their needs , in that they did not understand the deception of banking ,where were they to come up with the money to pay the interest.As a result , we were put into debt.Usury is condemned in the bible .Taxation became the means of collecting the interest out of the live stock [ the people] through the fruits of their labor.[ the only real currency] When you register your child with the state/province via the receipt of birth , a BIRTH CERTIFICATE is created in all capital letters .This is your straw man in commerce and this is the entity that the tax is applied.You are a flesh man created by GOD and given free will . You did not authorize this contract and were not given full disclosure as you were put into this contract as an infant by your parents.However , every time you accept a benefit from the " government " or submit a return or apply for a drivers licence AND apply your signature on the document in your normal fashion, you are accepting liability for your straw man.There is a bond created on your existence worth about 700,000.00 .This bond is in fact yours and it is in reality your exemption from public debts.On the back of your birth certificate is a bond tracking number.If you study Winston Shrouts seminars on SOLUTIONS IN COMMERCE you will be able to capture this bond via your birth certificate and a UCC1 financing statement and use it to set-off public debts.
ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION
The constitution was put in place by the powers of the day to protect the people from the aggressive English .Taxation as explained is necessary ONLY to pay the debt which is as a result of compounding interest on money that does not exist.The world is controlled by the bankers and not by the government as we are led to believe.The judge is in fact working for the banker and in reality a trustee in the involuntary bankruptcy of our country as well as the USA .Yes , Canada as well as the us are insolvent .The us was in bankruptcy since 1779 and it appears Canada was never solvent so has been in perpetual bankruptcy at least since 1867.The entity that claims to be our government is in fact a corporation and is registered in Washington DC. Our elected officials are actually ceos of this corporation.The CRA/IRS is in fact under the umbrella of the IMF ( INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND) and thus under the UN ( UNITED NATIONS) We are not heading for world government , we are already in world government.The elite welfare recipients ( status quo ) sit at the top of the food chain feasting off the labor of the working class ( the only creators of true wealth ) This is why nothing ever changes , no matter who we put in government.This is not to say there are not some within that are good people but the claws of the beast are around their necks.See how the alleged front runners in the USA election race are belittling Ron Paul who is speaking the truth. Those who are in "the system " clergy,bankers, accountants, lawyers , civil servants , educators, police , military etc do not want the system changed for they would have to find real work . So you see , the constitution applies to government and was put in place to protect the people however , what we have is a defacto government . When you go into court with the constitution , you are in fact taking on a corporation that is masquerading as our government.The only people liable to the rules and regulations of this entity are those that are employed by that entity.You are not their employee so you are not subject to their laws.You can only contract through your acceptance of there laws and can not be forced against your free will. However most of us do not know this and due to our conditioning do not even question it until recently.There are many organizations throughout the country that are focused on the why and are sharing information with each other and it is becoming quite clear that we are living in a massive deception.
ABOUT THE BANKING SYSTEM
Under our constitution section 91 , the only entity that has the power to create money lawfully in our country is the federal government . They also are supposed to have power over banks and banking.In 1913 in a secret meeting in Jekyll Island Georgia , the private bankers with help of some US politicians took over the powers of money creation illegally and created the Federal Reserve ( a private banking monopoly ) The pseudo government creates treasury bills and bonds and trades them with the Federal Reserve in exchange for money and wind up paying interest on that money which they can create themselves.The Bank of Canada is under the control of the Federal Reserve.We do not have one voting member in the Bank of Canada .All the wars are as a result of these hideous bankers.They funded both sides and control the people through inflation etc.
ABOUT A CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE
In that the pseudo government is trying to keep up the facade that they are in fact the real thing ,they have no choice but to come to the table when there is a constitutional issue.They will try and make you make an application to the Attorney General of Canada ( defacto ag ) and the Attorney General of Nova Scotia through something called the CONSTITUTION QUESTIONS ACT . I dare say that if you do this , they can probably decline your application so my advise is DO NOT do it.Acts and statutes apply to your straw man , not to you. Do not let them take dominion over you the free will man.When I acted as agent for a friend of mine a couple of years ago , I did not make application , I just advised the prosecutor and the courts two weeks before trial that we were going to raise constitutional concerns.They were scared shitless and in the end stayed the charges.The prosecutor that was originally assigned the case backed out and a lawyer from CRA took over .Also the original judge was removed and we were before the chief judge for the province of NS . A stay is still a victory although we did not get a ruling by the judge. He did not dare as the whole facade depends on the ignorance of the people.Please see below some sections of the Constitution.The ones we will focus on are sec 53/54/57/91 and 92 .
THE ROLE OF THE GOVERNOR GENERAL
At the top of sectIon 53 , note it says "MONEY VOTES; ROYAL ASSENT " Sec 53 states :Bills for appropriating any Part of the Public Revenue,or for imposing any Tax or Impost , shall originate in the House of Commons. Sec 54 states : It SHALL NOT be lawful to adopt or pass etc etc ( read section) that HAS NOT been first recommended to that house by Message of the Governor General in the Session in which such Vote,Resolution,Address,or Bill is proposed. Sec 57 paragraph 2 states: An Entry of every such Speech,Message,or Proclamation shall be made in the Journal of each House , and a Duplicate thereof duly attested shall be delivered to the proper Officer to be kept among the records of Canada.
VERY IMPORTANT
There have been no less than four attempts by myself and others to get a copy of the speech where the Governor in Council addressed the house on the income tax act.We went through the office of the local MP Peter MacKay and his secretary went to HANSARD ( the government records) and they sent us a bunch of smoke and mirrors BUT NOT THE SPEECH .It appears it does not exist therefore as it says in Sec 54 ' IT SHALL NOT BE LAWFUL" Now go to sec 91 POWERS OF PARLIAMENT In the preamble it says : It shall be lawful for the Queen,etc,etc to make laws for peace order and GOOD government of Canada , in relation to all matters NOT NOT NOT coming within the classes of subjects by this act assigned EXCLUSIVELY EXCLUSIVELY to the Legislatures of the Provinces. You will see that the Parliament has the right to raise money by any mode or system of taxation 91-3 however It IS NOT IS NOT permitted to DIRECT TAX which is the EXCLUSIVE EXCLUSIVE power of the Legislature . See the preamble at the top of sec 92 EXCLUSIVE POWERS OF THE PROVINCIAL LEGISLATURES AND SEC 92-2 reads Direct Taxation within the province in order to the raising of Revenue for Provincial Purposes. The federal government IS IN VIOLATION of the exclusive power of the Provinces by levying direct taxes on the people . The constitution forbids it .This is confirmed by the supreme court in 1950 in the LORD NELSON HOTEL CASE . ( we have copies) The fed can only levy a direct tax in the event of a war or natural disaster and can only do so with 100 % agreement by the provinces and only for a period of five years without getting re approval.The fed tried to usurp the powers of the provinces with the Meech Lake and Charlottetown Accords under Trudeau and Mulroney but both attempts failed thanks to Quebec and Newfoundland. Any time you wind up in a tax issue , the CRA will use the CARRON CASE from the 1920's as being there right to direct tax the people . This case was a war measure and at the time of the war debt from the first war.However in that CARRON CASE , the judge inserted words into the constitution by stating that the fed could " THAT THE FED COULD RAISE MONEY BY DIRECT TAXATION FOR DOMINION PURPOSES" This statement is false as the judge can only interpret the written law , he is not allowed to write into an existing law that which is not written. Please refer to Bob Marquis book for more information and you can get the entire constitution on line by googling Constitution Act 1867.Read the sections 91 and 92 and you will see that 91 gives the powers to Parliament over currency and coinage ,banking and the incorporation of banks , and THE ISSUE OF PAPER MONEY. The Parliament did not have the authority to transfer this power to the private bank and this is also confirmed by the SUPREME COURT CASE of 1950 .The powers given to the different levels of government CANNOT be transferred to each other . The fed IS NOT allowed to direct tax period.You will also note that the provinces have exclusive power under sec 92-14 The administration of justice in the province.The RCMP are a federal force and in that the province cannot transfer their exclusive powers , the RCMP is operating illegally in this region in defiance of the constitution. .Ontario and Quebec both have provincial forces. OPP and QPP.
If your lawyer is genuine , this information will beat the devil in the court . If he dismisses it then dismiss him .If he dares to go into court with this information , he runs the risk of being disbarred due to his oath to the crown.However if he is one of those rare individuals that puts people before profits and justice for all ahead of personal gain , his reward will be far greater than any monetary value he could ever receive. Hope this helps you , used properly , I know it will
All the best
BJ
Thursday, January 17, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Just a quickie as I am on the road - s. 53 of the BNA - on no less than 2 occasions, the speaker of the House ruled that this section, which echoed procedures in England, only applies to the appropriation of monies, not the raising of them. So unless you can get a copy of these two rulings, on in early 1900's and the other I believe in mid 1950's (circa), determine the errors of fact and/or law, this issue will go nowhere. I believe s. 53 can be read two ways and the Speaker ruled in accordance with previous English procedures on this point. It is to pivotal to have proper research done. I have seen these rulings and actually had a copy however I can no longer seem to find them. You can however write to the Speaker of the House and ask for these previous rulings and I'm sure you will have them provided to you.
Again, if a claim is going to be made that there is a $700 000.00 bond created (I have previously heard $1 000 000.00) which I do not rule out against, somebody better find the actual documentary and/or legal proof of same. Making these allegations, true and/or believable as they may be, without proof, = want of credibility.
Hi Dave,
Thanks for input.I have a letter from Bob Marquis and it came from Malcom S Thompson that states somewhat that ( not verbatim) "sec 53 recently stood up in court when the female judge refused twice to order the taxpayer to file a t1 return and it was due to the fact that there is NO RECORD of the gg addressing parliment on the income tax act and she knew if she did order same , she could be charged under the criminal code with fraud " .You told me your self that their is no true certified copy of the income tax act available.
The speaker is only one mp is he not , he has not the power of the whole.I raised this in court along with the other sections and cra DID NOT want to go there ,so they stayed the charges and that was more than a year ago.You know that the direct tax by the fed is 100 % unconstitutional .They can only levy a direct tax in the event of a war or natural disaster and only with 100 % approval by all provinces.
I know you are not a fan of Winston Shrout, but I have purchased 4 seminars on his research and find his work to be very thorough.It is in his seminars that I heard the 700,000.00 figure and with a ucc1 financing statement (ppsa in Canada) and a copy of your birth certificate ( on bond paper) you can lay claim to your bond and use it to set-off public debts.
We have to accept that other researchers are perhaps in this crusade for the same reason you and I and Eldon and Ozzie and Gorkon are and that their research has to be considered at least until it is proven to be fabricated.
Do you know Gorkon ( Gordon) He has done much research on the bills of exchange act and it was he who directed me to Winstons work It was Eldon who put me in touch with Gordon.Everybodies research must be put in the mixer and we must move forward as a cohesive group of learned teachers of truth .
Remember, politics is perception ...it is not what it is ....it IS what WE percieve it to be.
The Blue Collar Movement thing is really taking off and the politicans are getting a bit nervous as they should.The status quo has got to go or at least become inclusive of the working class.
over
bj
Peace, order, and good government
Main article: Peace, order and good government
Section 91 authorizes Parliament to "make laws for the peace, order, and good government of Canada, in relation to all matters not coming within the classes of subjects by this Act assigned exclusively to the Legislatures of the provinces". This gives Parliament residuary powers to enact laws in any area that has not been allocated to the provincial governments. Thus, when analyzing each matter of jurisdictional dispute, it is with the mind that if it is not enumerated, then it is within the de jure authority of Parliament.
FROM BOUVIERS LAW DICTIONARY 1856
IMPOSITIONS. Imposts, taxes, or contributions.
POSTED FROM THE CONSTITUTION READ IT FOR YOURSELF...........
MONEY VOTES; ROYAL ASSENT
Appropriation and Tax Bills 53. Bills for appropriating any Part of the Public Revenue, 'OR' for imposing any Tax or Impost, shall originate in the House of Commons.
Recommendation of Money Votes 54. It shall not be lawful for the House of Commons to adopt or pass any Vote, Resolution, Address, or Bill for the Appropriation of any Part of the Public Revenue, or of any Tax or Impost, to any Purpose that has not been first recommended to that House by Message of the Governor General in the Session in which such Vote, Resolution, Address, or Bill is proposed.
Signification of Queen's Pleasure on Bill reserved 57. A Bill reserved for the Signification of the Queen's Pleasure shall not have any Force unless and until, within Two Years from the Day on which it was presented to the Governor General for the Queen's Assent, the Governor General signifies, by Speech or Message to each of the Houses of the Parliament or by Proclamation, that it has received the Assent of the Queen in Council.
An Entry of every such Speech, Message, or Proclamation shall be made in the Journal of each House, and a Duplicate thereof duly attested shall be delivered to the proper Officer to be kept among the Records of Canada.
Bankruptcy of U.S in 1933 &
State of Emergency, War Powers &
Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917
Bankruptcy
The United States went "bankrupt" in 1933. [President Roosevelt Executive Order 6073, 6102,
6111, 6260; Senate Report 93-549, pgs. 187 & 594, 1973]
In 1950, declared "bankruptcy and reorganization". Secretary of Treasury appointer receiver in
the bankruptcy [Reorganization Plan, No. 26, 5 U.S.C.A. 903; Public Law 94-564; Legislative
History, Pg. 5967]
The Secretary of the Treasury is the "Governor" of the International Monetary Fund, Inc. of the
U.N. [Public Law 94-564, supra, pg. 5942; U.S. Government Manual 1990/91, pgs. 480-81;
26 U.S.C.A. 7701(a)(11); Treasury Delegation Order No 150-10]
On Oct. 28th 1977, the United States as a "Corporator" and "State" declared insolvancy. State
banks and most other banks were put under control of the "Governor" of the "Fund" (I.M.F.). 26
IRC 165 (g)(1); U.C.C. 1-201(23), C.R.S. 39-22-103.5, Westfall vs. Braley, 10 Ohio 188,
75 Am. Dec. 509, Adams vs. Richardson, 337 S.W. 2d. 911 Ward vs. Smith, 7 Wall 447
"Mr. Speaker, we are now in Chapter 11. Members of Congress are official Trustees presiding
over the greatest reorganization of any bankrupt entity in world history, the United States
government..." -- (Mr. Trafficant from Ohio, Congressional Record, pg. H1303, March 17th, 1993)
"...the United States obligations in the International Monetary Fund..." -- Public Law 94-564,
94th Congress, Sec. 10(a)
State of National Emergency
"Since March 9th, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency..."
(Senate Resolution 9, 93d. Congress, 1st. Session, Foreward, 1973)
"When Congress declares an emergency, there is no Constitution..." (Congressman Beck,
Congressional Record, Farm Bill, 1933)
"A majority of people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For
40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in varying
degrees been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency..." -- Senate
Report 93-549 (Introduction) 1973
"The President may: Seize property, organize commodities, assign military forces abroad, institute
Martial Law, seize and control and transportation and communication, regulate operation of private
enterprise, restrict travel, and in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American
citizens". -- Senate Report 93-549; Senate Resolution 9, 93d Congress, 1st. Session (III) 1973
See: Chapter 1, Title 1, Section 48, Statute 1, March 9, 1933; Proclamation 2038; Title 12 U.S.C 95(b)
Currently, permanent state of national emergency. -- 22 U.S.C.A. 286d. 1977;
See: Executive Order 12919 signed by President Clinton
Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 & 1933 (People Declared the Enemy)
Oct. 6, 1917, under the Trading with the Enemy Act, Section 2, subdivision (c), Chapter 106 -
Enemy defined "other than citizens of the United States..."
March 9, 1933, Chapter 106, Section 5, subdivision (b) of the Trading with the Enemy Act of
Oct.6 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411) amended as follows "...any person within the United States.."
See H.R. 1491 Public No.1
YOUR STRAWMAN IS A “GOVERNMENT AGENCY”!
SEE THE EVIDENCE FROM THE GOVERMENT’S OWN MANUAL!!
See the “U.S. Government Styles Manual” for the evidence in section on “ABBREVIATIONS AND LETTER SYMBOLS” at:
http://www.access.gpo.gov/styleman/2000/pdf/chap09.pdf
This section states (emphasis added):
9.8. Except as otherwise designated, points and spaces are omitted after initials used as shortened names of governmental agencies and of other organized bodies. ``Other organized bodies'' shall be interpreted to mean organized bodies that have become popularly identified with a symbol, such as MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), GM (General Motors), GMAC (General Motors Acceptance Corp.), etc. (See ``List of Abbreviations.'') Symbols, when they appear in copy, may be used for acts of Congress. Example: ARA (Area Redevelopment Act).
VFW
NLRB
TVA
AFL-CIO
ARC
ASTM
Now do you see the trick?
The “governmental agency” for “John-Jay:Jones” is: “JOHN JAY JONES”.
There is no conspiracy about this -- it is just “hidden” in plain sight!!!
Chapter 11 deals with "Italics" and in 11.7 mentions that "Vessels" are in "other than lowercase roman". An "Vessel" is defined in 18 USC 9 as "… any citizen thereof or any corporation created by or under the laws of the United States or any State or Territory or district or possession." See links below:
http://www.access.gpo.gov/styleman/2000/pdf/chap11.pdf
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/9.html
Post a Comment