Thursday, April 12, 2012

Official Languages Act..re CAPITALIZATION OF NAME for extortion purposes...MAN is free, person is not

This is a great overview by a very learned man...A human rights activist...and a victim of the dreadful system of slavery going on for 250 years .....Paul Hellyer speaks of this in an interview at age 86..he was a defence minister in the old days... http://the2012scenario.com/2012/03/former-canadian-defense-minister-paul-hellyer-2012-ufo-congress-ufos-clean-energy-banking-and-more/

Be sure to read this info below.....when they are trying to close libraries and hide information, there is remedy....


On 12/04/2012 10:33 AM, xxxxxxx wrote:
Do you have a copy of the languages act? I thought you may have sent it to xxxxx. How does this act help??
From: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: April-12-12 6:39 PM
To: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Languages Act
Somewhere in one of my many document boxes. Find it here: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/O-3.01/

note:
"Short title
1. This Act may be cited as the Official Languages Act.
PURPOSE OF ACT < < < this is a contravention of the Act itself - "words" spelled with all capital letters
2. The purpose of this Act is to (a) ensure respect for English..." As I said, how can one show "respect for English" if the Rules of Grammar of English are disrespected? The Rules of Grammar of English do not allow any word to be written entirely in upper-case,
such as used here(and above): "NOW, THEREFORE, Her Majesty..." The same goes for the manner in which they spell "names" entirely in
upper-case lettering. Not only disrespectful of English, but denies them being identified as "proper nouns", which have only the first letter
capitalized. All capital letter spelling of a "name", indicates that it is not the "name of a person, place or thing", as the definition of "proper noun" dictates. See the following copied and pasted from an Online dictionary:

"What is a proper noun?
Definition A proper noun is a noun that is the name of a specific individual, place, or object."
So do you see what I am getting at? None of their documents are in compliance with the "Purpose" of the Official Languages Act
and makes them guilty of an offence under section 126(1) of the CCC, which reads: "Disobeying a statute - Every one who, without lawful
excuse, contravenes an Act of Parliament by wilfully doing anything that it forbids or by wilfully omitting to do anything that it requires to be done is, unless a punishment is expressly provided by law, guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years."

Here is what I found on "how to identify a proper noun" remember, the term "capitalize", as used below, refers only to the first letter, otherwise it would say to the effect, "entirely in upper-case"
"How do you identify proper noun in a sentence?
A proper noun should be capitalized. A proper noun is the name of a specific person, place, thing, or a title. For example, a person (common noun) may be a teacher (common noun), but the teacher's name Mr. Smith is a proper noun. A place (common noun) may be a city (common noun), but Montreal is a proper noun because it's the name of a specific city. The noun principal (common noun) becomes a proper noun when it is a title, Principal Brown. Another example are common nouns like war or peace when used as the title War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy, become proper nouns."

They have "wilfully" omitted to do what that Act requires them to do, namely, show "respect for English" and are subject to 2 years in jail.
If you or I did something of this nature, disobey a statute, (I think you are dealing with that now) they would have our asses in court.
So, if everyone truly is "equal before the law", well....

Also note, they use the term "Every one", spelled as two separate words, which is a reference to "things", whereas the term "Everyone",
as one word, always refers to "people".

Hope this helps you just remember, it is always better to have too much ammunition, than not enough.
db

On 12/04/2012 10:33 AM, Darren Martin wrote:
Hi Dave.
Do you have a copy of the languages act? I thought you may have sent it to Brian. How does this act help??

No comments: